Article View: sci.space
Article #8Re: Preventing hypothetical Comet Collision (was: Comet collision)
From: Faust
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1992 10:52
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1992 10:52
40 lines
3016 bytes
3016 bytes
In article <1992Oct26.221945.13810@gn.ecn.purdue.edu> mechalas@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (John P. Mechalas) writes:
>
>I saw a lot of stuff on this, too. And it brings up an interesting point.
>There have been a lot of scientists in recent years discussing the
>possibilities of comets and/or meteors striking the Earth.
> My question: How hard would it be to deflect an incoming object with,
>say, a nuclear explosive? This theory is one I have heard postulated many
>times, and have wondered how easy or hard such a task would be. The
>orbit mechanics aspects could be worked out, I am sure...given enough time.
>Plus, the greater the distance, the smaller an orbital perturbation would be
>needed to alter the orbit. But how much warning would we have in such an
>instance?
>
I'm a software designer, dammit, not an engineer :-) so I don't have
an answer on how much force would be required to deflect or destroy an
incoming comet. The force required would obviously depend on the objects
mass and velocity.
David Langford's WAR IN 2080 (an interesting speculation on the shape
of war in the future) deals with the use of asteroids (and other hunks
of rock floating around in space) as weopons. At high enough velocities
, an asteroid of sufficient size would be almost impossible to stop
without some form of mind boggling technology (such as a device that
soaks up inertia). Even if you blew the incoming object apart, many of
the remaining chunks would probably still hit the Earth.
The nastiest variant on this idea that he describes is the 'Relativistic
Missile'. This is an object (not necessarily of all that great mass)
which has been accelerated to near relativistic speeds (something on the
order of .7c) and aimed at whichever planet you don't like. Given the
enormous velocity of the object it would be hard to detect and difficult
to track, making it almost impossible to stop. When it hit the planet
the energy released would be enormous.
******** *** ** ** ******* ******** "Quantum Mechanics:
** ** ** ** ** ** ** even I don't fully
****** ******* ** ** ******* ** understand it."
** ** ** ** ** ** ** - Ian Sales
** ** ** ****** ******** ** csh019@cch.cov.ac.uk
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Bws0vG.9rC@cck.coventry.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!warwick!coventry!csh019References:
<1992Oct26.150328.22285@aio.jsc.nasa.gov> <BwqrFv.6sM@cck.coventry.ac.uk> <1992Oct26.221945.13810@gn.ecn.purdue.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.space,alt.sci.planetary Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!warwick!coventry!csh019 From: csh019@cch.coventry.ac.uk (Faust) Subject: Re: Preventing hypothetical Comet Collision (was: Comet collision) Message-ID: <Bws0vG.9rC@cck.coventry.ac.uk> Summary: Fast moving objects are very hard to stop Sender: news@cck.coventry.ac.uk (news user) Nntp-Posting-Host: cc_sysh Organization: Coventry University References: <1992Oct26.150328.22285@aio.jsc.nasa.gov> <BwqrFv.6sM@cck.coventry.ac.uk> <1992Oct26.221945.13810@gn.ecn.purdue.edu> Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1992 10:52:26 GMT Lines: 40