Article View: sci.space
Article #8250Re: space news from Sept 12 AW&ST
From: David Smith
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 1988 19:56
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 1988 19:56
18 lines
1280 bytes
1280 bytes
In article <1110@esunix.UUCP> bpendlet@esunix.UUCP (Bob Pendleton) writes: >Of course whoever (CSD?) builds the Titan-3 families solid rocket motors I think it is United Technologies. Is CSD the Chemical Systems Division of UTC? At any rate, there is an argument/discussion going on about the notion of barring Thiokol (or at least Morton) from future work. I'd like to know how that fits in with other companies' failures. What penalties were imposed on UTC/CSD for the Titan 34D explosion? What happened to Beech as a result of Apollo 13? Did Rockwell (still North American at the time?) suffer from Apollo 204? The Titan and Apollo 13 failures may not have been due to fundamental design faults, but Apollo 204 was. -- David Smith HP Labs dsmith@hplabs.hp.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5010@hplabsb.HP.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!bu-cs!purdue!decwrl!hplabs!hplabsb!dsmithReferences:
<23618@amdcad.AMD.COM> <1110@esunix.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!bu-cs!purdue!decwrl!hplabs!hplabsb!dsmith From: dsmith@hplabsb.HP.COM (David Smith) Newsgroups: sci.space,sci.space.shuttle Subject: Re: space news from Sept 12 AW&ST Message-ID: <5010@hplabsb.HP.COM> Date: 30 Nov 88 19:56:49 GMT References: <23618@amdcad.AMD.COM> <1110@esunix.UUCP> Reply-To: dsmith@hplabsb.UUCP (David Smith) Organization: Hewlett-Packard Labs, Palo Alto, CA Lines: 18