Article View: sci.space
Article #8412Re: SPACE Digest V9 #207
From: Nick Szabo
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 1989 21:34
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 1989 21:34
15 lines
1113 bytes
1113 bytes
In article <Added.8XrfC6y00Ui3MefU83@andrew.cmu.edu> HOWGREJ@YALEVM.BITNET (Greg Howard) writes: > >A manned mission generates much more interest, and >therefore will receive much more funding, than any unmanned probe (or 2000 >unmanned probes). This is a myth. A poll I recently posted shows that unmanned missions are more popular than manned. If NASA replaced the manned program to empty space with probes to many different and fascinating places in the solar system, I suspect public support and government funding would increase dramatically. Nick Szabo szabonj@fred.cs.washington.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<104@beaver.cs.washington.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!humpback!szabonjReferences:
<space-request+@ANDREW.CMU.EDU> <Added.8XrfC6y00Ui3MefU83@andrew.cmu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!humpback!szabonj From: szabonj@humpback (Nick Szabo) Newsgroups: sci.space Subject: Re: SPACE Digest V9 #207 Message-ID: <104@beaver.cs.washington.edu> Date: 27 Jan 89 21:34:50 GMT References: <space-request+@ANDREW.CMU.EDU> <Added.8XrfC6y00Ui3MefU83@andrew.cmu.edu> Sender: news@beaver.cs.washington.edu Reply-To: szabonj@humpback.UUCP (Nick Szabo) Organization: U of Washington, CSCI, Seattle Lines: 15