Article View: sci.space
Article #8605Re: Heavy Lift Vehicle
From: David Smith
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 1989 23:57
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 1989 23:57
54 lines
3097 bytes
3097 bytes
In article <4XwVpQy00Xc94aJ3IN@andrew.cmu.edu> kr0u+@andrew.cmu.edu (Kevin William Ryan) writes:
> Now, it's been said (with questionable veracity) that the Soviets have
>copied their Shuttle from us. What are the possibilities of copying some big
>boosters from them? Not necessarily Energia, but perhaps Proton? I would
>think that it's in the same class as redoing the Saturn V...
No reason to clone Proton when we have Titan III/IV.
There has been debate in this forum over whether or to what degree the
Soviets copied the US Shuttle. The idea was generally poo-poohed, more
than I thought warranted. Main differences cited are that the SSMEs are
gone, the OMS system moved into the main fuselage, the wings shifted
forward, and the nosewheel moved back. Someone offered as evidence of
non-copying that Buran's rudder was split into top and bottom halves.
But the US Shuttle has that same split. It just looks more pronounced on
Buran because the borders between black and white tiles are more blocky, with
more surface ending up black. I'm not convinced that a clean sheet design
would have come up with the same tail, complete with cutout to clear the
center/upper SSME's blast.
More similarities are noted in a recent AW&ST article (Jan 16, 1989, p.36):
Soviet officials here [Baikonur Cosmodrome] acknowledged that their
orbiter's basic design is patterned after that of the U.S. ... orbiter.
A closer examination of the Soviet spacecraft's design shows that
the similarities begin with the overall configuration, and continue
to such details as the form and layout of the forward fuselage's
flight deck, middeck and equipment bay; the payload bay
configuration; the general philosophy used for the cockpit
instrument panel layout, and the installation of the reaction
control system.
Drawings of the orbiter's crew compartment show that it is divided
into three levels, which seem patterned directly after those of the
U.S. space shuttle orbiter.
As with the U.S. orbiter, modular lockers are located forward on the
middeck, while the middeck's aft portion can be equipped with an
airlock.
The orbiter side hatch for crew entry and egress is located at the
middeck level. The hatch is about the same size as the 40-in.-dia.
side hatch on the U.S. orbiter--which also is positioned at the
middeck.
The Soviet orbiter's payload bay doors also are nearly identical to
those used on the U.S. vehicle... [including radiator panels]
--
David R. Smith, HP Labs
dsmith@hplabs.hp.com
(415) 857-7898
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5152@hplabsb.HP.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!hplabs!hplabsb!dsmithReferences:
<4XwVpQy00Xc94aJ3IN@andrew.cmu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!hplabs!hplabsb!dsmith From: dsmith@hplabsb.HP.COM (David Smith) Newsgroups: sci.space Subject: Re: Heavy Lift Vehicle Message-ID: <5152@hplabsb.HP.COM> Date: 10 Feb 89 23:57:18 GMT References: <4XwVpQy00Xc94aJ3IN@andrew.cmu.edu> Reply-To: dsmith@hplabsb.UUCP (David Smith) Organization: Hewlett-Packard Labs, Palo Alto, CA Lines: 54