🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.space
Article #8745

Re: Sanger

#8745
From: Mark Robert Thorson
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 1989 05:35
15 lines
964 bytes
>This seems like a better idea than HOTOL or NASP: no need to take the
>entire vehicle to orbit or to make the first stage capable of flight
>at extreme hypersonic speeds.
>
>	Paul F. Dietz
>	dietz@cs.rochester.edu

If I'm not mistaken, the original concept for the space shuttle called for
a manned, reusable plane to carry the shuttle to an altitude from which it
could make orbit by itself.  The solid-rocket boosters were a cost-saving
plan when the budget got cut.

Wouldn't a re-activiation of this design objective be one of the least
costly and most safe ways of turning our technological duckling into a
technological swan?
Technical Details
Message-ID: <15877@cup.portal.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!portal!cup.portal.com!mmm
References: <1989Mar14.172237.29235@cs.rochester.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!portal!cup.portal.com!mmm
From: mmm@cup.portal.com (Mark Robert Thorson)
Newsgroups: sci.space
Subject: Re: Sanger
Message-ID: <15877@cup.portal.com>
Date: 16 Mar 89 05:35:17 GMT
References: <1989Mar14.172237.29235@cs.rochester.edu>
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
Lines: 15