Re: space news from March 27 AW&ST

Article View: sci.space

Article #9032

#9032

From: Henry Spencer
Date: Thu, 11 May 1989 20:22

11 lines
1028 bytes

In article <52000@philabs.Philips.Com> rfc@briar.philips.com.UUCP (Robert Casey) writes:
>I believe I once heard that Enterprise was damaged (bent frame? or something)
>and was not flightworthy.  Any truth to this?

No damage that I know of.  It's overweight and well below normal orbiter
specs, but that's another story.  If you did a thorough refit on it, you
could theoretically fly it into space, although payload would be low due
to the overweight structure.
-- 
Mars in 1980s:  USSR, 2 tries, |     Henry Spencer at U of Toronto Zoology
2 failures; USA, 0 tries.      | uunet!attcan!utzoo!henry henry@zoo.toronto.edu

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1989May11.202243.1111@utzoo.uucp>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henry

References: <1989May8.033250.18780@utzoo.uucp> <15988@bellcore.bellcore.com> <6390@cbnews.ATT.COM> <52000@philabs.Philips.Com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: sci.space,sci.space.shuttle
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henry
From: henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer)
Subject: Re: space news from March 27 AW&ST
Message-ID: <1989May11.202243.1111@utzoo.uucp>
Organization: U of Toronto Zoology
References: <1989May8.033250.18780@utzoo.uucp> <15988@bellcore.bellcore.com> <6390@cbnews.ATT.COM> <52000@philabs.Philips.Com>
Date: Thu, 11 May 89 20:22:43 GMT

Reply to Parent Message