Re: more 747 drop tests?

Article View: sci.space

Article #9045

#9045

From: Henry Spencer
Date: Sat, 13 May 1989 06:48

9 lines
953 bytes

In article <1287@ncrcce.StPaul.NCR.COM> johnson@ncrcce.StPaul.NCR.COM (Wayne D. T. Johnson) writes:
>Why should NASA take the time and expense to drop the Enterprise when it can
>do the tests with an actule mission thats already paid for?

More tests sooner, plus the ability to run tests in varying conditions
without increasing the risk of losing a nearly-irreplaceable real orbiter.
-- 
Mars in 1980s:  USSR, 2 tries, |     Henry Spencer at U of Toronto Zoology
2 failures; USA, 0 tries.      | uunet!attcan!utzoo!henry henry@zoo.toronto.edu

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1989May13.064840.11665@utzoo.uucp>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henry

References:

<1989May8.033250.18780@utzoo.uucp> <15988@bellcore.bellcore.com> <1989May9.014323.13717@utzoo.uucp> <1287@ncrcce.StPaul.NCR.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: sci.space,sci.space.shuttle
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henry
From: henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer)
Subject: Re: more 747 drop tests?
Message-ID: <1989May13.064840.11665@utzoo.uucp>
Organization: U of Toronto Zoology
References: <1989May8.033250.18780@utzoo.uucp> <15988@bellcore.bellcore.com> <1989May9.014323.13717@utzoo.uucp> <1287@ncrcce.StPaul.NCR.COM>
Date: Sat, 13 May 89 06:48:40 GMT

Reply to Parent Message