Article View: sci.space
Article #6506GEO satellites as electrical vehicles
From: Bruce Dunn
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 01:10
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 01:10
26 lines
1632 bytes
1632 bytes
Regarding Geosynchronous satellites launched from a DC-1
> Allen W. Sherzer writes:
>
> Maybe you use lower costs to fly redundant satellites, each less relaible.
> When one breaks, it uses a high efficiency electric engine to come back to
> LEO where it is repaired, refueled, and returned. Maybe we abandon comsats
> in GEO and place them in LEO. I can think of lots of alternatives.
An interesting idea. Modern comsats have several kilowatts of power,
enough to run an ion or arcjet engine. An electric engine running off a few
kilowatts has a mass of only a few kg, so could easily be carried on the
vehicle. The same ion engine could be used for station keeping - all that
would be required is a larger propellant supply to allow for return to LEO.
A major problem would probably be radiation damage due to having to spend
some months in the Van Allen belts as the satellite spirals down to LEO.
This damages solar cells, but if the array is replacable, this might not be
too bad. Other electronics might have to be replaced because of radiation
damage, but during servicing it might be desirable to replace them anyway for
updating and extension of service life.
--
Bruce Dunn Vancouver, Canada Bruce_Dunn@mindlink.bc.ca
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<18949@mindlink.bc.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!rsoft!mindlink!a752Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.space Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!rsoft!mindlink!a752 From: Bruce_Dunn@mindlink.bc.ca (Bruce Dunn) Subject: GEO satellites as electrical vehicles Organization: MIND LINK! - British Columbia, Canada Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 01:10:31 GMT Message-ID: <18949@mindlink.bc.ca> Sender: news@deep.rsoft.bc.ca (Usenet) Lines: 26