Article View: sci.space
Article #7901Payload of shuttle flight directly after last Challenger.
From: eric townsend
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1988 20:30
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1988 20:30
28 lines
1718 bytes
1718 bytes
According to activist and musician Jello Biafra, the next flight of the shuttle was to carring a payload of 46 pounds of *plutonium*. He claims this is from _The_Nation_ and _Common_Cause_, who got it from NASA, who "conveniently forgot to tell us about it." What I'd like to know is: 1. Is this correct? 2. If so, I thought there was a law or treaty or something that we're involved with that prohibits the launching of radioactive material into space; and that this treaty was the reason we don't put nuclear reactors into space. Can anyone confirm/deny/refuse to comment on any of this? [ FYI: J. Biafra's talk "Why I'm Glad the Space Shuttle Blew Up" is about 3 and half minutes long, and has to do with the 46 pounds of plutonium slated for the next shuttle mission. It can be found on _No_More_Cocoons_ (Alternative Tentacles virus 59) -- a double speach-only album by Jello Biafra; and also on The Birth of Tragedy Magazine's _Fear_Power_God_ Spoken Word/Graven Image Compilation album (CFY Records). ] -- J. Eric Townsend ->uunet!nuchat!flatline!erict smail:511Parker#2,Hstn,Tx,77007 Just another journalist with too much computing power.| 'Hey, watch me ollie 'Girls play with toys. Real women skate.' --Powell Peralta ad.| this <whump>'
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<347@flatline.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!husc6!mit-eddie!ll-xn!ames!amdahl!nuchat!flatline!erictShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!husc6!mit-eddie!ll-xn!ames!amdahl!nuchat!flatline!erict From: erict@flatline.UUCP (eric townsend) Newsgroups: sci.space,sci.space.shuttle Subject: Payload of shuttle flight directly after last Challenger. Keywords: Gak, you know. The next flight. Message-ID: <347@flatline.UUCP> Date: 1 Feb 88 20:30:20 GMT Organization: flatline in Houston(Montrose, really), Tx. Lines: 28