Thread View: sci.space
3 messages
3 total messages
Started by Gooding.WBST
Tue, 14 Oct 1986 20:50
Pop-top SRB's
Author: Gooding.WBST
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 1986 20:50
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 1986 20:50
16 lines
1328 bytes
1328 bytes
Consider the following scenario: A significant malfunction is detected during the early part of an STS mission following lift-off. The appropriate designated individual in mission control orders an abort. This order pops the tops of the SRB's off and away from the orbiter. Reverse thrust nozzles are now exposed and the SRB's top ends are ignited. The thrust of the already burning ends are effectively countered allowing the orbiter to detach before the SRB's buckle and submit to a destruct order along with the ET. The orbiter makes a best effort emergency landing based on speed, altitude, etc. Is this a viable method in which to minimize the risks of STS missions encountered from lift-off to SRB burnout? Steve <Gooding.WBST@Xerox.COM> Disclaimer disclaimer
Re: Pop-top SRB's
Author: David Smith
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 1986 21:02
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 1986 21:02
19 lines
1524 bytes
1524 bytes
> This [abort] order pops the tops of the SRB's off and away from the > orbiter. Reverse thrust nozzles are now exposed and the SRB's top ends > are ignited. The thrust of the already burning ends are effectively > countered allowing the orbiter to detach before the SRB's buckle and > submit to a destruct order along with the ET. Based on what AW&ST said about the IUS/TDRSS failure (to the effect that continued chamber pressure is necessary to support combustion), maybe blowing the top off would extinguish the fire. Note that the SRB is hollow and burns from the inside out along its whole length. But if blowing the cap doesn't extinguish the motor, I doubt it would help. If the orbiter lets go, it will pivot around the rear attachment points and break up, as previously noted in this forum. If the SRBs are jettisoned, the orbiter and tank must fly through the plume. If nothing is cut loose, the front-end exhaust from the SRBs will impinge on the oxygen tank. David Smith
Re: Pop-top SRB's
Author: John Mundt
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 1986 23:32
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 1986 23:32
7 lines
945 bytes
945 bytes
One of the biggest problems early in flight is having enough of a velocity to make it back to the runway. If I understand you correctly, the reverse thrusters would slow things down before the orbiter detached. No profit in that. If the SRB's could be "pop-topped" the orbiter could then shut down the main engines and release from the ET while still maintaining as much velocity as possible.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads