🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

4 total messages Started by ESG7 Fri, 17 Oct 1986 13:26
Nuclear Fusion Pulse Propulsion Systems -- available literature
#7676
Author: ESG7
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 1986 13:26
59 lines
2385 bytes
Someone asked about source material on Nuclear Fusion Pulse rockets for

interstellar travel.  The best source is the Project Daedalus final

report produced by the British Interplanetary society.  To acquire a

copy write:



               The British Interplanetary Society

               27/29 South Lambeth Road

               Lonon SW8 1SZ, England



Also the Journal of the British Interplanetarey Society (JBIS),

Interstellar Studies (red cover series) often describes this style of

propulsion along with Bussard ram scoop and antimatter propulsion

schemes.  The JBIS is hands down, the best source of information about

the engineering on interstellar travel.  There is also a paper floating

around entitled: "A Laser Fusion Rocket for Interplanetary Propulsion"

by Roderick A. Hyde, 27 Set. 1983 from Lawrence Livermore National

Laboratory (Larry Labs), preprint number UCRL-88857.  Roderick Hyde is a

nuclear weapons designer who designs starships when he isn't designing a

bigger and better thermonuclear warhead.  Supposably, most of his major

innovations on starship design are classified (Q-Clearance).  Also

"Astronautica ACTA" will on occasion produce something on interstellar

travel.  The most exciting stuff with respect to interstellar travel is

being done by Sandia National Labs.  Sandia is working on an inertial

confinement scheme based on high energy neutral particle beams rather

than lasers.  This sort of system could easily be adapted into a one

million sec. specific impulse propulsion system.  Word has it that the

Nova, Novette inertial confinement scheme at Larry Labs is a loser and

only good for bomb work.  It'll never be useful for producing electrical

power or propelling a spacecraft.

                                   Gary Allen
Re: Nuclear Fusion Pulse Propulsion Systems -- available literature
#7681
Author: Henry Spencer
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 1986 02:10
11 lines
1037 bytes
> ...  Word has it that the
> Nova, Novette inertial confinement scheme at Larry Labs is a loser and
> only good for bomb work.  It'll never be useful for producing electrical
> power or propelling a spacecraft.

Laser fusion has never looked particularly good for propelling spacecraft;
lasers are too inefficient and too heavy.  This is why the Daedalus study
picked electron-beam fusion instead.
-- 
				Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology
				{allegra,ihnp4,decvax,pyramid}!utzoo!henry
Re: Nuclear Fusion Pulse Propulsion Systems -- available literature
#7697
Author: Paul M Koloc
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1986 04:07
46 lines
3087 bytes
>> ...  Word has it that the
>> Nova, Novette inertial confinement scheme at Larry Labs is a loser and
>> only good for bomb work.  It'll never be useful for producing electrical
>> power or propelling a spacecraft.

In article <7245@utzoo.UUCP> henry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer) writes:
>Laser fusion has never looked particularly good for propelling spacecraft;
>lasers are too inefficient and too heavy.  This is why the Daedalus study
>picked electron-beam fusion instead.

That choice was made some time ago, and now it seems that light
ion beam fusion looks more promising.. . but,  still doubtful.  
Although (assuming every thing works) the size reduction would be 
very significant from laser to light ion fusion devices, the size 
is still too large to be viable for boost phase or "planetary"
work.  

The "Spheromak" is about the right size and is simple enough to
consider for use as a source for fusion driven propulsion, but it
has serious engineering problems due to the need for a "tightly
fitting" conducting shell.  This shell is solid in Spheromaks,
and tends to be vaporized by the dense adjacent fusion plasma.

The PLASMAK(TM) uses a plasma shell and surrounding high pressure
gas blanket as the "wall", and gets much better conductivity by
setting up with energetic electron currents.  Because it can be
compression heated, it can burn protium boron eleven to three
helium nucleii, and that means no radiation problems.  The
recirculated liquid density gas blanket is plasmatized by the 
fusion energy and that in turn either drives an inductive MHD 
electric power generator at 60 hertz, OR it could be expanded 
directly to generate boost thrust for lift phase applications,
during planetary landings/lift-offs. 

Since these plasmoids are formed by direct or inductive electric
discharge in the fusion fuels, and the compression heating is 
ideally efficient, the resulting engines will be very compact
in size.  Averarge power would be on the order of 10 gigawatts.

In propulsion applications thrust would vary greatly depending
on available mass reserves.  
+---------------------------------------------------------+--------+
| Paul M. Koloc, President: (301) 445-1075                | FUSION |
| Prometheus II, Ltd.; College Park, MD 20740-0222        |  this  |
| {umcp-cs | seismo}!prometheus!pmk; pmk@prometheus.UUCP  | decade |
+---------------------------------------------------------+--------+
Re: Nuclear Fusion Pulse Propulsion Systems -- available literature
#7705
Author: Robert DeMarco
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 1986 15:00
2 lines
660 bytes
 Whats a gigawhat?
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads