🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.stat.math
Article #15

Re: Dropping standards

#15
From: Deep Fried Lettuce
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 06:37
56 lines
3285 bytes
BMJ wrote:
> Taenia Solium wrote:
> > straydog <advocacy@sdf.lonestar.org> writes:
> >
> >
> >>We, over on the newsgroup sci.research.careers, heard about this
> >>thread and we get into serious debates and discussions about the
> >>declining standards in the USA and I think its true.
> >
> >
> >>Thresholds have
> >>been lowered for grades, my wife was an adjunct prof at a local
> >>community college and she was not allowed to give anyone less than
a C
> >>and she knew students that should not have passed.
> >
> >
> >
> > This is happening globally.
> >
> > Some of the kids in my son's law class ( at one of the elite Group
of Eight universities)
> > simply should not be there.
> >
> > But they will be permitted to pass and inflict themselves upon
unsuspecting clients.
>
> That's because one of the purposes of a post-secondary institution is
to
> guarantee student success, whatever that's supposed to mean.  I
> concluded that to many of them, it's being amply rewarded for doing
next
> to nothing or playing the system to one's favour.
>
> It scares me to think that I might be crossing a bridge or entering a

> building that some of them might have had a hand in designing.



so why in the hell are the standards in this and education in
general being ALLOWED to slip lower and lower evey few years?

And as for marks why is it that grades are always artificially inflated
not reflecting the true nature of a student's performance?

Exactly who was the bizarre person that thought this would be a good
idea?







John
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1116398224.808357.92540@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <1115922962.400539.135900@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <kk3881ljuv3ujgjiikb6npph5nntqcmhgn@4ax.com> <1115956264.008196.132030@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <1115959934.335237.305400@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <d62iv0$503k@odds.stat.purdue.edu> <Pine.NEB.4.62.0505131839420.3686@ukato.freeshell.org> <87mzqtm9mw.fsf_-_@kafka.homenet> <s8Aie.1398315$8l.642040@pd7tw1no>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10d632,694a043254ae7218
X-Google-Thread: f732f,694a043254ae7218
X-Google-Thread: f8886,8e003644a40cb3b3
X-Google-Thread: 10df0c,db63db42ab56e0c0
X-Google-Thread: 1083c4,4f67d992c458b285,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d632,gidf732f,gidf8886,gid10df0c,gid1083c4,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Deep Fried Lettuce" <sittinginthepool@internode.on.net>
Newsgroups: sci.stat.math,sci.stat.edu,sci.research.careers,aus.politics,aus.general
Subject: Re: Dropping standards
Date: 17 May 2005 23:37:04 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 57
Message-ID: <1116398224.808357.92540@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
References: <1115922962.400539.135900@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
   <kk3881ljuv3ujgjiikb6npph5nntqcmhgn@4ax.com>
   <1115956264.008196.132030@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
   <1115959934.335237.305400@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
   <d62iv0$503k@odds.stat.purdue.edu>
   <Pine.NEB.4.62.0505131839420.3686@ukato.freeshell.org>
   <87mzqtm9mw.fsf_-_@kafka.homenet>
   <s8Aie.1398315$8l.642040@pd7tw1no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 150.101.64.162
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1116398232 29386 127.0.0.1 (18 May 2005 06:37:12 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 06:37:12 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <s8Aie.1398315$8l.642040@pd7tw1no>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=150.101.64.162;
   posting-account=vmj3Vg0AAADh0F4DSOUx7-SGpludBVvI