Article View: sci.stat.math
Article #7Re: Dropping standards
From: straydog
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 01:53
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 01:53
73 lines
4556 bytes
4556 bytes
On Wed, 18 May 2005 Russell.Martin@wdn.com wrote: > Date: 18 May 2005 06:32:22 -0700 > From: Russell.Martin@wdn.com > Newsgroups: sci.stat.math, sci.stat.edu, sci.research.careers, aus.politics, > aus.general > Subject: Re: Dropping standards > > > beliav...@aol.com wrote: > > snip > >> >> The following paper, which can be downloaded from >> http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=426763 (membership >> is required but is free), confirms your view that student > satisfaction >> should not be overweighted as a measure of teaching quality. > Objective >> measures of student learning should be given more weight. >> >> Web-Based Student Evaluations of Professors: The Relations Between >> Perceived Quality, Easiness, and Sexiness >> JAMES FELTON >> Central Michigan University - Department of Finance and Law >> JOHN MITCHELL >> Central Michigan University - Department of Finance and Law >> MICHAEL STINSON >> Central Michigan University - Department of Computer Science >> Abstract: >> College students publicly rate their professors' teaching at >> RateMyProfessors.com, a web page where students anonymously judge > their >> professors on Quality, Easiness, and Sexiness. Using the data from > this >> web site, we examine the relations between Quality, Easiness, and >> Sexiness for 3,190 professors at 25 universities. For faculty with at >> least 10 student posts, the correlation between Quality and Easiness > is >> 0.61, and the correlation between Quality and Sexiness is 0.30. Using >> simple linear regression, we find that about half of the variation in >> Quality is a function of Easiness and Sexiness. Accordingly, these >> results suggest that about half of the variation in student opinion >> survey scores used by universities for promotion, tenure, and > teaching >> award decisions may be due to the easiness of the course and the >> sexiness of the professor. When grouped into sexy and non-sexy >> professors, the data reveal that students give sexy-rated professors >> higher Quality and Easiness scores. Based on these findings, >> universities need to rethink the use of student opinion surveys as a >> valid measure of teaching effectiveness. High student opinion survey >> scores might well be viewed with suspicion rather than reverence, > since >> they might indicate a lack of rigor, little student learning, and > grade >> inflation. >> >> Keywords: Teaching, Evaluation, Student Opinion, Halo Effect >> JEL Classifications: I21, J44, M51 > > Easy + sexy = quality? Yes, that's a good equation for a date > but hardly appropriate for a teacher. ;-) > > Cheers, > Russell > > Yep, I said that, too, in another post.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Pine.NEB.4.62.0505210153360.1163@ukato.freeshell.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!news-out.nntp.be!propagator2-sterling.newsfeeds.com!news-in.newsfeeds.com!in.nntp.be!egsner!news.cirr.com!ukato.freeshell.org!advocacyReferences:
<1115922962.400539.135900@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <kk3881ljuv3ujgjiikb6npph5nntqcmhgn@4ax.com> <1115956264.008196.132030@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <1115959934.335237.305400@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <d62iv0$503k@odds.stat.purdue.edu> <Pine.NEB.4.62.0505131839420.3686@ukato.freeshell.org> <87mzqtm9mw.fsf_-_@kafka.homenet> <s8Aie.1398315$8l.642040@pd7tw1no> <1116398224.808357.92540@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <NKGie.1401978$Xk.1002685@pd7tw3no> <1116422661.279990.180950@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1116423142.055577.162480@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10d632,694a043254ae7218 X-Google-Thread: f732f,694a043254ae7218 X-Google-Thread: 10df0c,db63db42ab56e0c0 X-Google-Thread: 1083c4,4f67d992c458b285 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d632,gidf732f,gid10df0c,gid1083c4,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!news-out.nntp.be!propagator2-sterling.newsfeeds.com!news-in.newsfeeds.com!in.nntp.be!egsner!news.cirr.com!ukato.freeshell.org!advocacy From: straydog <advocacy@sdf.lonestar.org> Newsgroups: sci.stat.math,sci.stat.edu,aus.politics,aus.general Subject: Re: Dropping standards Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 01:53:57 +0000 Organization: Central Iowa (Model) Railroad, Plano, TX, USA Lines: 161 Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.62.0505210153360.1163@ukato.freeshell.org> References: <1115922962.400539.135900@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <kk3881ljuv3ujgjiikb6npph5nntqcmhgn@4ax.com> <1115956264.008196.132030@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <1115959934.335237.305400@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <d62iv0$503k@odds.stat.purdue.edu> <Pine.NEB.4.62.0505131839420.3686@ukato.freeshell.org> <87mzqtm9mw.fsf_-_@kafka.homenet> <s8Aie.1398315$8l.642040@pd7tw1no> <1116398224.808357.92540@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <NKGie.1401978$Xk.1002685@pd7tw3no> <1116422661.279990.180950@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1116423142.055577.162480@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ukato.freeshell.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Trace: chessie.cirr.com 1116640472 5255 192.94.73.7 (21 May 2005 01:54:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@cirr.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 01:54:32 +0000 (UTC) X-X-Sender: advocacy@ukato.freeshell.org In-Reply-To: <1116423142.055577.162480@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>