🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.stat.math
Article #7

Re: Dropping standards

#7
From: straydog
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 01:53
73 lines
4556 bytes


On Wed, 18 May 2005 Russell.Martin@wdn.com wrote:

> Date: 18 May 2005 06:32:22 -0700
> From: Russell.Martin@wdn.com
> Newsgroups: sci.stat.math, sci.stat.edu, sci.research.careers, aus.politics,
>     aus.general
> Subject: Re: Dropping standards
> 
>
> beliav...@aol.com wrote:
>
> snip
>
>>
>> The following paper, which can be downloaded from
>> http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=426763 (membership
>> is required but is free), confirms your view that student
> satisfaction
>> should not be overweighted as a measure of teaching quality.
> Objective
>> measures of student learning should be given more weight.
>>
>> Web-Based Student Evaluations of Professors: The Relations Between
>> Perceived Quality, Easiness, and Sexiness
>> JAMES FELTON
>> Central Michigan University - Department of Finance and Law
>> JOHN MITCHELL
>> Central Michigan University - Department of Finance and Law
>> MICHAEL STINSON
>> Central Michigan University - Department of Computer Science
>> Abstract:
>> College students publicly rate their professors' teaching at
>> RateMyProfessors.com, a web page where students anonymously judge
> their
>> professors on Quality, Easiness, and Sexiness. Using the data from
> this
>> web site, we examine the relations between Quality, Easiness, and
>> Sexiness for 3,190 professors at 25 universities. For faculty with at
>> least 10 student posts, the correlation between Quality and Easiness
> is
>> 0.61, and the correlation between Quality and Sexiness is 0.30. Using
>> simple linear regression, we find that about half of the variation in
>> Quality is a function of Easiness and Sexiness. Accordingly, these
>> results suggest that about half of the variation in student opinion
>> survey scores used by universities for promotion, tenure, and
> teaching
>> award decisions may be due to the easiness of the course and the
>> sexiness of the professor. When grouped into sexy and non-sexy
>> professors, the data reveal that students give sexy-rated professors
>> higher Quality and Easiness scores. Based on these findings,
>> universities need to rethink the use of student opinion surveys as a
>> valid measure of teaching effectiveness. High student opinion survey
>> scores might well be viewed with suspicion rather than reverence,
> since
>> they might indicate a lack of rigor, little student learning, and
> grade
>> inflation.
>>
>> Keywords: Teaching, Evaluation, Student Opinion, Halo Effect
>> JEL Classifications: I21, J44, M51
>
> Easy + sexy = quality?  Yes, that's a good equation for a date
> but hardly appropriate for a teacher. ;-)
>
> Cheers,
> Russell
>
>

Yep, I said that, too, in another post.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.62.0505210153360.1163@ukato.freeshell.org>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!news-out.nntp.be!propagator2-sterling.newsfeeds.com!news-in.newsfeeds.com!in.nntp.be!egsner!news.cirr.com!ukato.freeshell.org!advocacy
References: <1115922962.400539.135900@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <kk3881ljuv3ujgjiikb6npph5nntqcmhgn@4ax.com> <1115956264.008196.132030@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <1115959934.335237.305400@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <d62iv0$503k@odds.stat.purdue.edu> <Pine.NEB.4.62.0505131839420.3686@ukato.freeshell.org> <87mzqtm9mw.fsf_-_@kafka.homenet> <s8Aie.1398315$8l.642040@pd7tw1no> <1116398224.808357.92540@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <NKGie.1401978$Xk.1002685@pd7tw3no> <1116422661.279990.180950@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1116423142.055577.162480@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10d632,694a043254ae7218
X-Google-Thread: f732f,694a043254ae7218
X-Google-Thread: 10df0c,db63db42ab56e0c0
X-Google-Thread: 1083c4,4f67d992c458b285
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d632,gidf732f,gid10df0c,gid1083c4,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!news-out.nntp.be!propagator2-sterling.newsfeeds.com!news-in.newsfeeds.com!in.nntp.be!egsner!news.cirr.com!ukato.freeshell.org!advocacy
From: straydog <advocacy@sdf.lonestar.org>
Newsgroups: sci.stat.math,sci.stat.edu,aus.politics,aus.general
Subject: Re: Dropping standards
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 01:53:57 +0000
Organization: Central Iowa (Model) Railroad, Plano, TX, USA
Lines: 161
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.62.0505210153360.1163@ukato.freeshell.org>
References: <1115922962.400539.135900@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>  
 <kk3881ljuv3ujgjiikb6npph5nntqcmhgn@4ax.com>
 <1115956264.008196.132030@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
 <1115959934.335237.305400@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
 <d62iv0$503k@odds.stat.purdue.edu>   <Pine.NEB.4.62.0505131839420.3686@ukato.freeshell.org>
   <87mzqtm9mw.fsf_-_@kafka.homenet>   <s8Aie.1398315$8l.642040@pd7tw1no>
 <1116398224.808357.92540@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
 <NKGie.1401978$Xk.1002685@pd7tw3no>   <1116422661.279990.180950@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
 <1116423142.055577.162480@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ukato.freeshell.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Trace: chessie.cirr.com 1116640472 5255 192.94.73.7 (21 May 2005 01:54:32 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@cirr.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 01:54:32 +0000 (UTC)
X-X-Sender: advocacy@ukato.freeshell.org
In-Reply-To: <1116423142.055577.162480@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>