Article View: sci.techniques.microscopy
Article #16Re: Photographing bacteria in a Gram's stain
From: First of Three of Six
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 10:50
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 10:50
46 lines
3826 bytes
3826 bytes
"Scott Coutts" <scott.coutts@med.monash.edu.au> wrote in message news:uQ6Ae.36633$oJ.18937@news-server.bigpond.net.au... > First of Three of Six wrote: >> Hi can anyone share tips and tricks on capturing images of bacteria >> stained by Gram's method. >> I'm using an Olympus BX51 with a DP70 and capturing the images using >> Olysia BioReport. >> While I'm finding the process excellent for larger organisms via a 40 >> objective, when using oil 100 focusing and sharpness have suffered. >> Everything looks good on the screen, but then I transfer the image (saved >> as tif and usually around 36 MB) > > What are you doing with them? You probably dont need to photograph them at > such high resolution (well, with such large file sizes I should say). > > > >> and attempt some manipulation with Photoshop to resize to 96 dpi and save >> as jpg (10/10 quality) the picture degrades a little. > > > > Why do you want them at 96dpi? Do you need large image sizes? You may find > that the images are better when recorded in lower resolutions to begin > with if you dont need the print size. > > > >> Thanks in advance. I'm mostly keen to get any help on the best focussing >> techniques people use. > > Well, for focussing, I just focus until it's as sharp as I can get. Not > much you can do once you've done that. Now that memory is so cheap I record the material at the best quality I can and use photoshop to resize for a variety of purposes. I usually resize to 20 cm by 15 cm and 72 or 96 dpi for Intranet pages that I use for education. For printing (examinations, quality assurance or just for fun) I resolve to 300 and vary the size according to the print size I want. These smaller image files are usually deleted and I retain the original file on a server and portable media. I don't keep everything, just the images I like. This doesn't just apply to photomicroscopy but all forms of image capture. Thanks for answering my questions, I just wanted to make sure I was doing everything possible to optimise my material. As for capture as a lower magnification, it's a bit hard to see things like polar staining or vacuolation in a bacterium at less than using a 100 oil immersion objective.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<n47Ae.36661$oJ.34021@news-server.bigpond.net.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!newscon02.news.prodigy.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!lon-transit.news.telstra.net!lon-in.news.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!news-server.bigpond.net.au!53ab2750!not-for-mailReferences:
<Dv6Ae.36608$oJ.11643@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <uQ6Ae.36633$oJ.18937@news-server.bigpond.net.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 106237,39b742f934e8b7b0 X-Google-Thread: f6a65,39b742f934e8b7b0 X-Google-Thread: 104764,39b742f934e8b7b0 X-Google-Thread: 10813c,39b742f934e8b7b0 X-Google-Thread: f60cd,39b742f934e8b7b0 X-Google-Attributes: gid106237,gidf6a65,gid104764,gid10813c,gidf60cd,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!newscon02.news.prodigy.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!lon-transit.news.telstra.net!lon-in.news.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!news-server.bigpond.net.au!53ab2750!not-for-mail Reply-To: "First of Three of Six" <georgewbush@washington.com> From: "First of Three of Six" <firstofthreeofsix@hotmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.techniques.microscopy,bionet.microbiology,sci.bio.microbiology,sci.med.laboratory,sci.med.pathology References: <Dv6Ae.36608$oJ.11643@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <uQ6Ae.36633$oJ.18937@news-server.bigpond.net.au> Subject: Re: Photographing bacteria in a Gram's stain Lines: 48 Organization: The Federation X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Message-ID: <n47Ae.36661$oJ.34021@news-server.bigpond.net.au> Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 10:50:59 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 60.231.211.28 X-Complaints-To: abuse@bigpond.net.au X-Trace: news-server.bigpond.net.au 1120992659 60.231.211.28 (Sun, 10 Jul 2005 20:50:59 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 20:50:59 EST