Article View: sci.techniques.xtallography
Article #21Re: Building in "O"
From: Gerard Kleijwegt
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 1995 00:00
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 1995 00:00
57 lines
3277 bytes
3277 bytes
In article <3t9qb4$g6c@news.ox.ac.uk>, dnicker@sable.ox.ac.uk (Darren Nickerson) writes: |> Dear "O" gurus, |> |> In the absence of the resources offered by the "O" WWW server (it is currently |> unreachable due to hardware trouble I understand), I am turning to you for a actually, it's the O-info mail server that's down; the WWW page works (I think) |> quick bit of advice on a fairly straightforward problem. |> |> I have a model refined to R=0.20 at 1.8A, in which all but 9 of the approx 300 |> residues have been built. I see "patchy" density for the remaining residues, |> and I would like to build them in in the hopes that the improved phases will |> reveal the entire chain. I would like to build 2 unconnected sections of |> 3 residues, but I'm not sure of the best way to accomplish this in "O". The |> model was built with Frodo, and only recently have I discovered the "joy of O". |> I have never built in O at all, so any pointers to useful info would be much |> appreciated. As well, quick suggestions as to potential troubles in building |> such a "disconnected" model would be helpful. |> |> Thanks in advance, |> |> -Darren Nickerson well, since it has to be quick'n'dirty, I would do the following (alwyn would tell you to learn the baton commands): - mutate_insert all 9 missing residues (e.g. as Alanines) - use lego_loop to get coordinates for their CA atoms (select the loop that passes to most of your patches of density) - move_atom the CAs into the density - use lego_auto_mc to put the main-chain coords in - use lego_auto_sc for the side-chain atoms - use move_zone (or rsr_rigid) on individual residues to fit them better into the density - regularise the geometry with refi_zone - then I would throw this into a 4000K slow cool (with all nine residues as ala so they can move around a lot if they want to) - after that, look at the density & decide what to do (put in the real side chains or delete again) for each of the nine trouble makers - if you have NCS, i would constrain it & average the maps (2Fo-Fc and Fo-Fc) to see if the density gets better the O tutorial teaches you how to model insertions (chapter 8); the manual explains individual commands on the other hand, from R & resolution i assume that your model is already fairly complete (waters etc); the current map is therefore a kind of omit map for the missing bits; if there is no good density yet, perhaps the residues are disordered putting something in may lead to *apparently* better phases/maps due to model bias, without really improving the model, so beware --cd
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3ta9gp$1gqq@columba.udac.uu.se>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3t9qb4$g6c@news.ox.ac.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1060e8,6e177c90c4915312 X-Google-Attributes: gid1060e8,public X-Google-Thread: fcf0b,6e177c90c4915312 X-Google-Attributes: gidfcf0b,public X-Google-Thread: f804b,6e177c90c4915312 X-Google-Attributes: gidf804b,public From: gerard@rigel.bmc.uu.se (Gerard Kleijwegt) Subject: Re: Building in "O" Date: 1995/07/04 Message-ID: <3ta9gp$1gqq@columba.udac.uu.se> X-Deja-AN: 105657769 distribution: world references: <3t9qb4$g6c@news.ox.ac.uk> organization: Uppsala University newsgroups: sci.techniques.xtallography,bionet.xtallography,bionet.molec-model