Re: Western Digital network adapter

Article View: sco.opendesktop

Article #7

From: Brad Templeton
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 1990 06:43

11 lines
955 bytes

What are the compatability groups for these ethernet adaptors?  The
ones supported by SCO, such as the 8003, do seem to be less common.
Why is that?  It seems that the general Novell style adapters are the
most common, for obvious reasons.

Is it the case that many are actually compatible, just not on the
officially supported list?

Are the 3Com type any faster or slower than the WD type?
-- 
Brad Templeton, ClariNet Communications Corp. -- Waterloo, Ontario 519/884-7473

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1990Jun11.064342.2307@looking.on.ca>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!looking!brad

References: <1990Jun4.181144.734@mabjab> <6443@scorn.sco.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!looking!brad
From: brad@looking.on.ca (Brad Templeton)
Newsgroups: sco.opendesktop,comp.unix.i386
Subject: Re: Western Digital network adapter
Keywords: WD EtherCard PLUS, SCO ODT Networking
Message-ID: <1990Jun11.064342.2307@looking.on.ca>
Date: 11 Jun 90 06:43:42 GMT
References: <1990Jun4.181144.734@mabjab> <6443@scorn.sco.COM>
Organization: Looking Glass Software Ltd.
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message