🚀 go-pugleaf

These types of listing, actuarial summaries, leave one thing out
of the equation: time of exposure, the amount of time operating,
traveling in or on, and accounts of distances traveled. A person
operating or traveling in an automobile is exposed for greater times 
than a person operating or traveling in an airplane. There are very 
few, if any, documentations of exposure to miles by time factors. An
equation that would factor in riding or horse or in a horse and buggy
mode of travel would be far less than a person on a bicycle. Hopes 
this jogs some thinking on the subject as you step over the "road
apples" of sophist arguments.

DCI   
 



On Fri, 26 Dec 1997 07:00:51 GMT, unit451@hotmail.com (Smokey Be hr) wrote:

>On Fri, 19 Dec 1997 05:11:55 GMT, herberj@ibm.net (John W. Herberg)
>scrawled on the whiteboard in the Physics lab:
>
>>On Sun, 14 Dec 1997 19:20:05 -0800, jafo@cheetah.net (Jafo) wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 14 Dec 1997 12:04:09 GMT, zombie wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 13 Dec 1997 14:17:18 -0800, "Dani Kuettel" <kuettel@dsp.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Every 450 cars are responsible for one fatality;
>>>>>Every 100 cars are responsible for one handicapped person;
>>>>>Every 7 cars are responsible for one injured person;
>>>>>Every 50 minutes a new car is produced that will kill someone;
>>>>>Every 50 seconds a new car is produced that will injure someone.
>>>
>
>PUHLEEEEEZZZZZEEEEE... Why don't you figure the number of airplanes,
>or busses, or toasters for that matter...
>>>>What crap.  That's like saying guns kill people.  Things don't kill people,
>>>>people kill people.
>>>
>>>That's right.  And any number of "cars" are responsible for none of
>>>the above; every time I've seen a car moving down the street, there's
>>>been a person at the wheel.  These are just cars, they're not
>>>Terminator units.
>>
>And those people need to be properly trained and educated in the
>proper use of the vehicle. Penalties for improper use need to be
>increased, and laws regarding motor vehicles need to be simple and
>sane.
>>
>>That long thought out argument and all you can attack is the signature
>>- pretty sad.  
>>
>>
>That's all most lamers can attack.
>>
>>---------------
>>John W. Herberg
>>herberj@ibm.net
>
>Smokey Behr
>SP(UTU)M Arson, Flame, and (mail)Bomb Investigation Team
>unit451@hotmail.com
>Spammers killed to date: 2
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Pursuant to 47 USC, unsolicited e-mail sent to these addresses is subject
>to an archival fee of not less than $500 U.S. per copy. E-mail recieved
>after any receipt of this notice implies acceptance of these terms. A
>copy of the specific law regarding this activity may be found at 
>HTTP://WWW.LAW.CORNELL.EDU/uscode/47/227.shtml
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Fight SPAM! Join CAUCE! http://www.cauce.org
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------