Thread View: sdnet.general
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by Dave Lister
Sat, 29 Sep 2001 03:17
cox@home
Author: Dave Lister
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 03:17
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 03:17
30 lines
2822 bytes
2822 bytes
I recently purchased a Com21 Doxport 1110, a DOCSIS certified, @Home level-2 approved modem. It was a very good buy ($159). http://www.com21.com/products/cable_modems/doxport/doxport1110.html Tonight I find out that this modem cannot be used on the San Diego Cox@Home system particularly, as it is not on Cox's approved modem list even though it is @Home approved. This situation is unacceptable. Cox is a member of Cablelabs. If there is a problem with DOCSIS certification, it should be addressed by Cox. @Home is the network provider. If there is a problem with @Home Level-2 that should be addressed. In reality, you are choosing to allow an EXTREMELY small subset of the available DOCSIS certified modems be used on the Cox San Diego network. This is in direct contradiction with the purpose of DOCSIS and CableLabs to begin with, namely, that a person who owns a modem in, say Atlanta, can take that modem and use it in San Diego. The DOCSIS certification SERVES NO OTHER PURPOSE. IF DOCSIS is pointless, why are people spending thousands to get certified? Or is this merely another facade as in OpenCable? Now, I want a GOOD reason as to why you are not supporting modems that have been put through two rounds of certification directly for YOUR network, and before you try to blow smoke at me, I have been designing cable modem chips since 1993. I want to know why we have the farce of DOCSIS certification, and the additional farce of @Home approval, if I still can't buy a compliant modem at will.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads