🚀 go-pugleaf

Handsome dominant American man and his submissive but strong willed 
beautiful Japanese wife own an English school in Japan.  We seek a 
woman who is interested in serving.  Giving herself to the needs of 
others.  Who would work as a teacher in our school.
While I am dominant, I am also very gentle and caring man.  I am 
interested in health, nutrition, social issues, but often quite unique 
and not politically correct ways.
I think women naturally should be beneath men.  This might be better 
to say, submissives should be beneath dominants.  I understand there 
are men who need to serve dominant women.  And relationships where a 
few men might center around a single woman.  As Bob Dylan said, "We 
all have to serve somebody."  I myself serve my wife who serves me.  
Any dominant is serving the needs of the submissive to serve.  The 
Chinese have a saying.  He who rules truly serves and (s)he who serves 
truly rules.
I do not see a man being above a woman as meaning the man is in any 
way superior.  It is much more each finding their own place in life 
and the relationship.  As an analogy, I don't see a roof because it is 
above the walls of a house as being superior to the walls.  If you 
have a roof and no walls on a windy rainy day, you will be happy you 
are drier, but the blowing wind will make you cold and some rain will 
reach you in the blowing wind.  If you have walls and no roof, the 
wind is stopped so you feel warmer but the falling rain makes you wet 
and there will still be some wind.  If you have a roof and walls where 
the walls are above the roof, you are still protected from the wind 
but wet.  
If the walls are beneath the roof, you are protected from the rain and 
the wind.  Does this make the roof superior to the walls?  I don't 
think so.  It makes the two in harmony to each other.
Women should lead a man by pulling him in the direction they want him 
to go.  This requires a woman be much more subtle and indirect.  We 
have made these qualities suspect in our cultures.  We now raise women 
to be pseudo men.  The feminist movement seems to do this more than 
others.  The pseudo man female is rewarded with high position and 
power.  In many cases she must be tougher than the men she is working 
and "competing" with.  I do not think this is feminist. It is anti 
feminist.
I do not, however, think women should be passive and blindly follow 
men.  Their activism must be emptying a space in front of their man 
causing him to naturally go in the path of least resistance.  This 
path is one she has chosen.  He takes this path thinking and feeling 
he is the one leading.  His wife obediently following behind adjusting 
his course.  This style of managing a man is far more difficult than 
the standard, "You should do this" way of telling a man what you want.  
This art has been lost and degraded.  The woman who does this is seen 
as weak or manipulative.
If you think of men and women sexually and look at the construction of 
their sexual parts, it is easy to see the way they might work.
A man has a cock.  It swells up and is pushed into a woman.  A woman 
has a pussy.  It is an empty hole.  It wants things pushed into it.  
Does the man put out his cock and a woman is there?  Or does the woman 
open her legs and the man goes to the empty space.  When a man "Makes 
the first move" hasn't he been subtly invited?  When she looks and 
then looks down as he looks at her, who has made the "first move"?
Even the use of a mouth is instructive.  A woman opens her mouth and 
takes a cock into it.  The ultimate level of this pleasuring is to 
offer her throat.  Again we are dealing with emptiness.
A man uses his tongue.  Something he uses to stick into and use to 
lick with.  It resembles his cock in many ways in its use and action.  
In all cases it is the friction of these opposites which creates the 
flow of power, energy and pleasure.
In both of these, there is a blurring of the line.  Within the center 
of men is a woman and within the center of women is a man.
Much of what I know comes from the women who have lived and served me.  
Their gentle pull manipulated me.  When I was younger, I thought this 
manipulation was wrong.  I had been raised to think darkness, subtlety 
and manipulation were wrong.  But this would be like thinking rain was 
wrong.  Or sleeping, or thought.
Each of these things has their place.  The flow of energy is the power 
generated between a man and woman.  My wife and I are interested in 
developing this power.  In our personal relationship, we hope to have 
women who feed their power into me and receive greater power in 
return.  I feel women need closer bonds between women to get and give 
feminine support to each other.  The sharing love with each other and 
sharing their man as a path for certain women to develop their power.
I do not dominate women to push them down.  I push them upward.  As 
they rise, they pull and force me upward.  Most women have never been 
trained in the art of receiving energy.  And in the art of service.  
The art of giving needs to be seen as noble.  Men can see by honoring 
their woman's service and serving them, the whole relationship has 
more power.
Too much of the way people feel superior today is to degrade those 
around them.  I call a man a nigger and I have made my whiteness 
better than his blackness.  But do I do this because I am better or 
because I am sure I am not better.  I am not worthy and have little 
self value.  I raise myself by pushing down everything around me.
I want to build a world where we raise ourselves and empower others.  
If I make another great, her greatness has come from me.  I am the 
source of her greatness.  When I have made someone great, do they turn 
their back on the source of their greatness?  Truly powerful people 
reach back to the people who have helped them and raise them up.  They 
raise them above them and are in turned raised up themselves.  The 
process is called leapfrogging.  It takes courage, trust and loyalty.
My wife can allow another woman in our life because she knows I will 
not leave her.  Even if the greatest fantasy woman in the world came 
along, I would not leave her.  I have given my word and my word is in 
end the only thing I have.  I can allow her the pleasure of loving 
that woman because I love to return the pleasure she gives me.
All of this requires more attention and effort than we have been led 
to believe life should require, what with disposable diapers, pop 
tarts and zipless fucks.  It will require searching through a paradigm 
where equal is not a part of the mix.  Different and complimentary.  
Harmonious and equally needed.
In our business life, I would like to see women lead companies by 
pull.  To let their way of moving a company forward be different from 
a man's yet produce a similar result.
The woman we seek would need to be college educated.  This is a 
restriction placed on us by the Japanese government.  I have met some 
great teachers who had not even finished high school and some college 
educated assholes.  This woman would come and teach.  Becoming part of 
our family.  She would develop course materials, work on developing 
and entire program from start to finish in synergy with us and 
eventually manage this school.  From here, we would hope to develop 
other schools with this woman being at the head of them.
As to her sexuality, we are much less clear.  We would prefer a person 
who was actively submissive and actively bisexual.  I am interested in 
a woman who sees serving as an art form and wants to develop herself 
as a form of living art.
The salary range is in the $20 to 40K.  There is potential for far 
more.  We want to develop greatness in all of us.  A greatness beyond 
our own fantasies.
If you are interested, e-mail: zip@ma.interbroad.or.jp
If you are a women who does not fit the above description but are 
interested in what has been written here, please write us.  None of 
this is set in stone.