Article View: sfnet.test
Article #276who signs stupidly, when Raoul swells the independent dividend unlike the holding
From: Robbie Tolliver
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 07:36
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 07:36
34 lines
3010 bytes
3010 bytes
chooses instead to request approval * from his subjects for each and every exhibition and publication * of each and every image --- an exemplary scrupulousness. * * Then, in 1990, alerted to the "questionable" content of some of his * images by a local processing lab, the FBI arrested Joe Semien, Sturge's * assistant, invaded the photographer's San Francisco studio without a * warrant, and seized all his prints, negatives, records, and equipment; * thereafter, without arresting Sturges, or even charging him with * anything, they refused to return his property and did everything * possible to destroy him personally and professionally by branding * him a child pornographer On September 15, 1991, The New York Times reported that the Feds took the case to a grand jury after 17 months, and they immediately threw it out. And that "this was unusual because only the prosecution's evidence is presented to a grand jury and they generally return indictments at the Government's request". Excerpt from 'TO: A Journal of Poetry, Prose + the Visual Arts', Summer 1992: * Jock Sturges: * * It took another month to get the U.S. Attorney to admit they had * finished the investigation and that the case was closed. * * Before they were through they had interviewed forty-four families in * France to whom they lied outrageously. * * It seems the Feds were unable to get the French interested because * the French Police thought the photographs were just lovely. So the * Fren
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<D73E296E.DB786D7E@news.rcn.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.rcn.net!news.rcn.net.POSTED!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 103871,558fabab7f3966c3,start X-Google-Thread: f715e,558fabab7f3966c3,start X-Google-Thread: 115993,558fabab7f3966c3,start X-Google-Thread: fe65d,558fabab7f3966c3,start X-Google-Thread: f85d0,558fabab7f3966c3,start X-Google-Thread: 104f05,558fabab7f3966c3,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103871,gidf715e,gid115993,gidfe65d,gidf85d0,gid104f05,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.rcn.net!news.rcn.net.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 01:44:06 -0600 From: AFev3olCf@ijujqyki.org.co (Robbie Tolliver) Message-ID: <D73E296E.DB786D7E@news.rcn.com> Newsgroups: sfnet.test,mn.test,de.test,pl.test,ch.test,,news.admin.net-abuse.email Subject: who signs stupidly, when Raoul swells the independent dividend unlike the holding Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 07:36:11 GMT Organization: everybody mainly date in front of disabled anonymous squares Lines: 36 NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.237.131.184 X-Trace: sv3-WBhlhQBZkalv5kz2poUpq7KMKpd/0qUauV9v86PuLn20mMMzxP2RLcPy4I5GOryivtZyWRHtkEenVJ/!KqCz6cbVyir3sNc+K+wmGblKxHEs7NUPXJwreezVWRj4lDi3Bp00+xO86g2srb9QYpw= X-Complaints-To: abuse@rcn.net X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@rcn.net X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.20