Article View: sgi.general
Article #13Re: Analysis of PEX 5.1 and OpenGL 1.0
From: Greg Sands
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 1992 00:28
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 1992 00:28
39 lines
2671 bytes
2671 bytes
pmartz@dsd.es.com (Paul Martz) writes: >Well, I hear PEXlib more often advertised as an SPI -- systems >programmer interface, not intended for use by applications. >Applications which directly use PEXlib should know what they are >getting themselves into. Look at how few programmers today use Xlib, >most use any of the toolkits or other APIs currently available. What are the options then? We've just "discovered" that DEC bundled PEXlib with the latest Motif release for the DecStation (OK down here we're a bit behind!) Looking at the documentation, it seems as if the PEXlib implements functions that are very similar to those we currently use with Phigs. We've been looking for some time to use Phigs (or something similar) under X, but the Phigs/X widget provided misses out much of the functionality we need. At first glance it seemed (to me) that it wouldn't be too difficult to rewrite our graphics to use PEXlib. Yet everywhere I've looked, I've seen people saying not to! Could you give me a short explanation of why using PEXlib is not a good idea, of why Phigs (or something else) may be better, and what serious options there are for programming 3D graphics under X? If it helps, here's a bit of info: We've used GKS for many years (yuk!) under VWS on vaxen, a little bit of Phigs, and are now moving fully over to an X/Motif environment. Our graphics needs are for both 2D and 3D, and are for general output from a finite element package (also our own). We are currently running on Vaxes and Decstations, and would like to do some things on an Indigo (guess that means GL). Thanks for any help or explanation you can give; we are hoping to rewrite all of our graphics later in the year, and would like to make the best possible start that will let us use the full measure of hardware and software that we have/will have. Greg. -- Greg Sands. | Department of Engineering Science ----------- | University of Auckland g.sands@aukuni.ac.nz | New Zealand.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug7.002825.7958@ccu1.aukuni.ac.nz>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!wupost!waikato.ac.nz!aukuni.ac.nz!sandsReferences:
<1992Aug4.215142.6479@odin.corp.sgi.com> <1992Aug5.195634.9944@dsd.es.com> <o75njjk@fido.asd.sgi.com> <1992Aug6.173023.3987@dsd.es.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!wupost!waikato.ac.nz!aukuni.ac.nz!sands From: sands@ccu1.aukuni.ac.nz (Greg Sands) Newsgroups: sgi.general,comp.sys.sgi,comp.graphics,comp.windows.x.pex Subject: Re: Analysis of PEX 5.1 and OpenGL 1.0 Message-ID: <1992Aug7.002825.7958@ccu1.aukuni.ac.nz> Date: 7 Aug 92 00:28:25 GMT References: <1992Aug4.215142.6479@odin.corp.sgi.com> <1992Aug5.195634.9944@dsd.es.com> <o75njjk@fido.asd.sgi.com> <1992Aug6.173023.3987@dsd.es.com> Reply-To: g.sands@aukuni.ac.nz Organization: University of Auckland Lines: 39