Thread View: soc.history.science
2 messages
2 total messages
Started by Bo Warming
Thu, 02 Apr 1998 00:00
What-If no written language ?
Author: Bo Warming
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 1998 00:00
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 1998 00:00
113 lines
5376 bytes
5376 bytes
What-If no written language ?
A decade ago "Science" had a heavily illustrated article on medieval
waterwheels - how these were gradually improved, and communication about
improvements were done with drawings, not text.
This was the craddle of Newcomen's sensational steam engine (and
Papin's).
Soon followed Watt, whose thinking included far less innovation
but he had 1. an alliance with investor Boulton
2. latin and math knowledge, and feeling of what was the new learned
establishment's TASTE.
By inventing a physical UNIT : "horsepower" (making comparisons of
different machines slightly easier), he became the "Founder of
Industrialism" to the history books.
Galilaei and Renaissance had said "Measurement is next to godliness".
If no or less writing, tecknology had leaped faster and higher,
and female suppression of minds:
gossip, neurosis, psychosis, taste, rank, racism, politics had become
small matters,
relative to what is seen and felt and sold and bought.
A more happy world. More like Japan. This is no suggestion of any
revolution. Japan is damned boring, to you and me.Harmony is not for
Westerners addicted to drama and false conflicts.
Photography,film, screen-wonders of computers
help the illiterate to smell the great experiences of the writing upper
class
- that is great progress
(though patching broken cloths does not appeal to my idealism).
To understand birth of writing
we need to understand birth of language.
From Dunbars articles in "New Scientist"
I find the following scenario realistic:
Monkeys have large vocabularies
and cheat: "Look - a snake"
you cry, when you want your competitor to flee.
Then you can eat the tasty nuts you saw.
Upright walking was needed to carry and throw stones.
Thus our anatomy changed.
Warfare changed from chimpanzee ambush
and cannibalism (read Jane Goodall)
to battle formations and complicated strategy
(and weapon and castle tecknology).
The leadership (always women)
want their offspring to survive the battle and become promoted.
That needs gossip in peacetime,
to have your son made commander in chief
and have the the neighbors son fight in first frontline. The rest is �.
education.
Gossip is what made vocabulary explode.
More words with ambiguious meaning,
means that the families with monopoly
on good traditional knowledge,
social heritage,
will be able to out-fool the competing families.
Demagogery, interchanging synonymes,
as first made clear by Cato and Cicero,
is not unknown in primitive tribes
- although they are more hooked on body language. (Therefore they are
primitive.)
From China spread small drawings that became letters.
North Europe is said to have had pre-Christian monastery universities
with runes,
but most were cut in wood and have been burned by Christians.
The Middle East used clay and papyrus
and their ritual inscriptions was a monopoly of the priests, during the
first millenias after their introduction.
Gradually they were used to establish plots: Gilgamesh, Bible, Saga.
Suppression took place with repetitive rituals such as PREYING.
Mantras got too boring.
Reading became a better escapism from reality.
Middle Eastern tradition had terrible amounts of good-evil dualism.
The Odin(Wothan) counterparts - in their anti-heaven - were far less
devillish.
Smearing opponents became important debate among the Early Christians.
One of my German Jewish heroes is
Karl Kraus who said
"Purpose of debate is not to insult you opponent, it is to steal his
peace of mind"
(The Japs and Chinese don't even do that:
In Japan you keep your opinions to yourself, if you have any, or
carefully you let other peoples opinions influence your own... This makes
life much more difficult for professional critics, and they do have a
thing with exercising anything else than critics. If you really do not
like the work of an other, you usually do not write about them at
all. Ian Buruma("Behind the mask", now chief editor of largest
East Asian magazine - since anti-revisionists got closed Marco Polo,
asking Israel&USA to demand governmental censurship)
They read manga cartoons. Violence and pornographic is enjoyed openly and
shamelessly.
Slightly less written language and a more kean interest in material
THINGS and SPIRITUAL religion, searching for harmony, is their style.
Bo Warming. cand.scient. gymnasiel�rer, Bjelkes Alle 46, DK-2200
Copenhagen.TELEPHONE (+45)35861000.
E-mail: bowarming@bigfoot.com. URL: http://www.glistrup.com
Re: What-If no written language ?
Author: Frank Nilsen
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 1998 00:00
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 1998 00:00
11 lines
1295 bytes
1295 bytes
Warming, read my post Re: What if Bo Warming does not post here? If you stopped asking mind-numbingly pointless questions like this, no one would have a problem with you. For example, your question "What if no written language" is just pure stupidity, something Homer Simpson would ask. Sit down for two seconds and figure it out for yourself, instead of subjecting the rest of us to it. Thankyou. Bo Warming wrote: > What-If no written language ?
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads