Article View: soc.libraries.talk
Article #94Re: bibliographies on sexuality
From: Chris Syed
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 1992 15:05
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 1992 15:05
17 lines
1068 bytes
1068 bytes
In article <1992Oct2.183433.185@eff.org> kadie@eff.org (Carl M. Kadie) writes:
>
>All "vulgar", "reprehensible", "pornographic", or "poison[ous]"
>material that might be accessed from, created on, or stored ...
You raise important points, I think. What if the banners try
to force an end to all legitimate academic research in this
area? For example, John Money's books on paraphilias contain some
spicy stuff.
Is there evidence that the banners and burners are becoming
a threat, say, to medical libraries?
--
---
"We cannot think without imagining." -- Thomas Aquinas
cbs@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca (Chris Brown-Syed)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BvJwKG.8n8@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!utcsri!utgpu!cbsReferences:
<BvI49s.49C@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca> <1992Oct2.183433.185@eff.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: soc.libraries.talk,alt.comp.acad-freedom.talk Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!utcsri!utgpu!cbs From: cbs@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca (Chris Syed) Subject: Re: bibliographies on sexuality Message-ID: <BvJwKG.8n8@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca> Organization: UTCS Public Access References: <BvI49s.49C@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca> <1992Oct2.183433.185@eff.org> Date: Sat, 3 Oct 1992 15:05:02 GMT Lines: 17