Article View: socs.misc
Article #29Re: Canada and Quebec (was: REFERENDUM '92)
From: Thomas Jelonek
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 1992 22:18
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 1992 22:18
41 lines
2999 bytes
2999 bytes
In article <1992Nov6.152738.13901@cs.mcgill.ca>, depeche@cs.mcgill.ca (Acme Instant Dehydrated Boulder Kit) writes: |> In article <1992Nov4.230737.29054@thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu> thomas@McRCIM.McGill.EDU (Thomas Jelonek) writes: |> > |> >|> in basic human nature. Any of various forms of dictatorship is fine |> >|> provided the dictator is truly benevolent and the populace all agree |> >|> with the dictator on a few basic values - but that too we don't know |> >|> how to ensure. |> > |> >I am unware of any historical precedent of a `benevolent dictator'. Thus I |> >doubt the viability of this approach. Of course, I would not refuse the |> >position of `benevolent dictator' if it would be offered to me. |> |> Well, in Singapore, they got a list of human rights violations a mile long, |> and you're not allowed to chew gum anywhere in the country, but the form of |> government definitely qualifies as a benign dictatorship. It used to be one |> of the scummiest islands in south east asia, with disease, drugs, |> prostitution and crime rife. Now it's the cleanest place in that region, |> with among the best quality of life ratings, economic growth, availability |> of education, health care, and employment. All this in the last 25 |> some-odd years. Good example. I suppose another example of a benign dictator is Boris Yeltsin. |> The dictator in place [I forget his name] is almost single-handedly |> responsible for all this change. He's got a lot of power, but he definitely |> cares about the people he governs, and while he cuts a few corners and |> steps on a few feet, his intentions are admirable. Is everything really so rosy in Singapore? I know there have been some social costs related to Singapore's cosy realtionship with multinational corporations. |> But alas, nobody in the US would accept such a form of government. |> I don't chew gum, but I still would not accept this form of government. In such a society I suspect that individual expression and creativity would be limited. I imagine it is like living in IBM. Thomas
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov6.221819.24646@thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!news.byu.edu!hamblin.math.byu.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!olivea!charnel!sifon!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!thomasReferences:
<14054@elevia.uniforum.qc.ca> <1992Nov4.052742.16237@thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu> <1992Nov4.230737.29054@thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu> <1992Nov6.152738.13901@cs.mcgill.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!news.byu.edu!hamblin.math.byu.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!olivea!charnel!sifon!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!thomas From: thomas@McRCIM.McGill.EDU (Thomas Jelonek) Newsgroups: socs.misc,alt.canada,soc.canada,alt.politics.canada,mcgill.general,soc.culture.canada,can.politics Subject: Re: Canada and Quebec (was: REFERENDUM '92) Message-ID: <1992Nov6.221819.24646@thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu> Date: 6 Nov 92 22:18:19 GMT References: <14054@elevia.uniforum.qc.ca> <1992Nov4.052742.16237@thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu> <1992Nov4.230737.29054@thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu> <1992Nov6.152738.13901@cs.mcgill.ca> Sender: news@thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu Organization: McGill Research Centre for Intelligent Machines Lines: 42 Originator: thomas@gauguin.mcrcim.mcgill.edu Nntp-Posting-Host: gauguin.mcrcim.mcgill.edu