🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <18277-4F3DFA41-213@baytvnwsxa001.msntv.msn.com>,
 ajax777g@msn.com (Ajax Greekgod) wrote:

> sorry but mutated bacteria continuing to mutate under controlled
> conditions is not evolution.

What part of it violates the rules of evolution?
As far as I can see all life under any conditions is always evolving, or 
going exinct, which is also a sometime consequence of evolving..


> also, many ,many people cofuse "adaptation" with "evolution"...
> adaptation is a horse slowly losing its toes and growing a hoof over
> thousands of years....

Which is a part of, but not all of, evolution.


> evoltion would be that same horse turning into a chicken over a long
> time..never happened,never will..

Evolution is a species changing when it is less than optimally adapted 
to its environment, either to be better adapted, or going extinct.

> just last year bio-tech scientists proved man and ape have no common dna
> ancestor...

On the contrary, the DNA evidence f common ancestry is overwhelmingly 
supportive of such common ancestry, at least to those who understand it.

> now, a few uneducted people reading this will say"apes have just one
> less chromosone then humans"...but the answer to "that a certian bean
> has the same amount of chromosones as a human.."..the number of
> chromosones does not matter, it is what is IN those chromosones...

And one human chromosome has been shown to be a melding of two previous 
chromosomes at some point in the probably distant past.