🚀 go-pugleaf

<snip> 
> This is not a complete model yet, we will need to know more details
> about particle phsyics at the energy scales of the grand unified
> theories, and perhaps beyond.

Not a compelte theory??? Yet you would hold it up as an argument for an
origin theory that didn't require an external force (read God) to start
the process? "We don't know all the facts, but we have faith that they
will be discovered in the future". Particularly the oft touted "grand
unified theory". Well, what if it turns out that the answer to the
"grand unified theory" is God?

Back to the theory. Is this based on Hawkins' no boundary case of
Fyneman's sum over histories theory? The one that says that the source
of the original energy (which is the source of matter) was a process of
borrowing - i.e. pushing out an equivalent amount of negative energy in
an anti-universe? It's an interesting theory (really, no sarcasm
intended). But it still doesn't explain why the universe bothered to
exist in the first place. And if it's the natural order of things, why
isn't it still ongoing (i.e. where's the inflation?).

Side note: what do you think about the recent findings about the
Japanese group that think they have shown that nutrinos (at least one
type of them) have mass?