Article View: talk.bizarre
Article #15911Re: CD vs. LP again (was Re: Preamp and Amp)
From: Scott Dorsey
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 19:39
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 19:39
20 lines
1487 bytes
1487 bytes
In article <1993Jan25.160847.3542@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes: >In article <1k11ssINNju6@transfer.stratus.com> rsud@sw.stratus.com (Rajiv Sud) writes: >>In article <93Jan22.222934est.47553@neat.cs.toronto.edu>, tlai@cs.toronto.edu (Tony W H Lai) writes: >>> >>> So euphonic distortions are unwanted? Does this mean you want accurate >>> sound, and not pleasant sound? Isn't that an argument the pro-digital >>> people use? :) >> >> It is their battle cry. And yes, it is what all of us seek. If >>only the digitoids had it on something besides paper. >> > >Under what convoluted definition of 'bizarre' does this techno-crap fall? I would consider the sounds that come from MD and DCC machines to be quite definitely bizarre. Not to mention distorted and not euphonic. --scott You can probably hear DCC at the Bob, but I am sending the MD machine back. It's really horrible.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1k1fl5INNgub@rave.larc.nasa.gov>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!news.larc.nasa.gov!grissom.larc.nasa.gov!kludgeReferences:
<93Jan22.222934est.47553@neat.cs.toronto.edu> <1k11ssINNju6@transfer.stratus.com> <1993Jan25.160847.3542@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!news.larc.nasa.gov!grissom.larc.nasa.gov!kludge From: kludge@grissom.larc.nasa.gov (Scott Dorsey) Newsgroups: talk.bizarre Subject: Re: CD vs. LP again (was Re: Preamp and Amp) Date: 25 Jan 1993 19:39:17 GMT Organization: NASA Langley Research Center and Reptile Farm Lines: 20 Message-ID: <1k1fl5INNgub@rave.larc.nasa.gov> References: <93Jan22.222934est.47553@neat.cs.toronto.edu> <1k11ssINNju6@transfer.stratus.com> <1993Jan25.160847.3542@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> NNTP-Posting-Host: grissom.larc.nasa.gov