Article View: talk.bizarre
Article #15948Obnoxious pillocks observation #1
From: adh
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 18:04
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 18:04
26 lines
1656 bytes
1656 bytes
there should, perhaps, be an apostrophe in the subject line. i don't think so, but you can judge for yourself. i note that at least one individual around here feels that people's bodies are for the delight of others, rather than in any sense to be used for the pleasure and convenience of the individual who inhabits them. this is clear from his repeated postings on the subject of breast reduction. i feel that he should practice what he preaches. when i was young, i was shown (as part of my school education) an animation of the mechanism by which a penis becomes erect. informative though this was, i think that a working model would be more effective. what i envisage is a human male, with the penis surgically modified with translucent and transparent components to permit easy observation and explanation. perhaps the circulatory system could be filled with some oxygenated, fluorescent marker solution to enhance the effect? i'm not a bio-modification expert. demonstrations could then be given by showing the updated person a pair of large prosthetic breasts, and observing the development of the inevitable ensuing priaprism. i assume we have a volunteer in the audience? wondering if hypocrisy is rife, adh
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<727985053.16959@minster.york.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!warwick!uknet!yorkohm!minster!adhShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!warwick!uknet!yorkohm!minster!adh From: adh@minster.york.ac.uk Newsgroups: talk.bizarre Subject: Obnoxious pillocks observation #1 Message-ID: <727985053.16959@minster.york.ac.uk> Date: 25 Jan 93 18:04:14 GMT Reply-To: adh@minster.york.ac.uk (adh) Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of York, England Lines: 26