🚀 go-pugleaf

John Krueger <krueger@cs.hope.edu> wrote:
]Hong Ooi wrote:
]> ljduchez@en.com (Lou Duchez) wrote:
]> >In article <XXXba789.911112068@news.prysm.net>,
]> >cuthulu@prysm.net (cuthulu) wrote:
]> >> On Sat, 02 Mar 1996 19:59:21 -0600, fridge@jump.net (Frank Ridgway)
]> >> wrote:
]> >> >In article <4haef0$6h7@dec-alpha.fred.net>, FOXFIRE
]> >> ><here@in.front.of.my.computer> wrote:
]> >> >  >Whom is used when it is in a nominative position. Who is used in an
]> >> >  >objective position.
]> >> >  >FOXFIRE
]> >> >
]> >> >It's the other way around.  "Whom"= objective case, "who" = nominative.
]> >>
]> >> You is correct, sir.
]> >>
]> >> But this post is off-topic for
]> >> alt.pinks&normals.who.only.think.they.have.slack.
]> >>
]> >> So, SHUT UP and go back to your soddin' FAULKNER!
]> >>
]> >> (or I'll tell everybody about that time you was naked on the flight line
]> >> of BAFB goddam MASTURBATIN' on a nuclear bomb.)
]> >>
]> >> Kevan Smith
]> >> http://www.rlabs.com/congress/
]> >
]> >Keep this crap out of alt.smokers.
]> 
]> This thread is off-topic for alt.religion.kibology. Please ensure all
]> followups are relevant to the newsgroup. Thank you.
]
]This discussion is off topic. Discussions about what is off-topic for
]alt.religion.kibology are off-topic in alt.religion.kibology, they belong
]in alt.religion.kibology.d. If you intend to continue discussing off-topic
]subjects, please redirect followups to alt.religion.kibology.d.

This meta-discussion is irrelevant.  The topic of discussions about
what is off-topic for alt.religion.kibology that are off-topic in
alt.religion.kibology is irrelevant in alt.religion.kibology.d;
they belong in alt.religion.kibology.d.d.  If you intend to continue
discussing off-topic discussions that concern off-topic subjects,
including the off-topicness thereof[1], please redirect followups to
alt.religion.kibology.d.d.  If you wish to talk about discussing the
irrelevance of conversations about off-topic subjects, as well as
other meta-meta-discussions, please use alt.religion.kibology.d.d.d.

Thank you.

[1] I'm talking about the off-topicness of discussions that concern
    off-topic subjects, not the off-topicness of the subjects themselves.
    Discussions about the off-topicness of specific subjects belongs in
    alt.religion.kibology.d.  I hope I am not confusing anyone.

[2] There is no footnote 2.  Or is there?[2]

Darren Stuart ``The fish the fish the fish ate ate ate'' Embry

-- 
Darren Stuart Embry ==> http://www.spd.louisville.edu/~dsembr01/
Commercial Radio Sucks: http://www.spd.louisville.edu/~dsembr01/rant-radio.html

"Being ashamed because you're different is the sickest kind of lie." -Kinghorse