Article View: talk.bizarre
Article #17504Re: My recommendation for "Quote of the week"
From: Robert
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 1994 09:03
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 1994 09:03
38 lines
3431 bytes
3431 bytes
On the old 'SDI was great! No it wasn't! It defeated communism! Communism
was doomed anyway!' debate,
kellmeye@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (kellmeyer steven l) writes:
>This is way, way off the subject of bit.listserv.catholic, but I can't
>resist. The argument presented above demonstrates a clear lack of
>understanding of strategic thinking. In order to prevent an attack, you
>merely have to destroy the attacker's nerve. Read accounts of pre-Civil
>War battles, and you'll see many references to "making a demonstration".
>A "demonstration" was something that looked like an active defense or
>attack, but was not. It made the opposition lose nerve, think twice,
>give in to the nagging fear of doubt that success in that direction was
>possible. The Star Wars defense did not have to be 100% reliable to be
>effective militarily, because military men understand how unreliable
>things are in war. If it was only 50% reliable (a figure that everyone
>agreed could be reached) it meant that the attacker couldn't be *certain*
>the targets he wanted taken out would, in fact, be taken out.
Good point, but the idea of a demonstration (otherwise known as a 'feint')
is that it costs you little or nothing. SDI cost the US far more than
simply building more nukes (the equivalent of a 'frontal attack') would
have done.
If you think 50% defence would have been sufficient, you don't realise
just how much damage to the US economy a _single_ nuclear strike would have
done.
>
>Besides which, everyone has always been on about disarmament. It seems
>to me that if you can guarantee 50% of the incoming missiles are destroyed,
>you've just managed a 50% unilateral disarmament process for the *OTHER*
>side. 50% of their weapons are essentially scrap metal with a rocket
>attached. Not too many weapons treaties managed that level of disarmament.
Again, not too many treaties cost billions of dollars. And remember SDI
never actually worked.
>Steve Kellmeyer kellmeye@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu
Robert Alcock.
--
For a good time call GetCurrentTime() <ierbb@csv.warwick.ac.uk>
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3c19di$d05@crocus.csv.warwick.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!pipex!warwick!not-for-mailReferences:
<39ojhd$22c@panix3.panix.com> <Karni06-3011941132070001@mac_rbk_3.chem.ucla.edu> <3bkh1m$ifo@icebox.mfltd.co.uk> <3bkos8$29r@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 110626,c8f470d087f65c24 X-Google-Attributes: gid110626,public X-Google-Thread: 10ed7b,c8f470d087f65c24 X-Google-Attributes: gid10ed7b,public X-Google-Thread: 105850,bb6458a0936217df X-Google-Attributes: gid105850,public X-Google-Thread: 10f3ae,c8f470d087f65c24 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f3ae,public X-Google-Thread: fe6ac,fb44a12018210dba X-Google-Attributes: gidfe6ac,public X-Google-Thread: 10cc42,fb44a12018210dba X-Google-Attributes: gid10cc42,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-12-06 01:04:09 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!pipex!warwick!not-for-mail From: ierbb@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Robert) Newsgroups: talk.bizarre,alt.folklore.urban,alt.fan.dan-quayle,talk.abortion,bit.listserv.catholic,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh Subject: Re: My recommendation for "Quote of the week" Date: 6 Dec 1994 09:03:46 -0000 Organization: University of Warwick, Coventry, UK Lines: 38 Message-ID: <3c19di$d05@crocus.csv.warwick.ac.uk> References: <39ojhd$22c@panix3.panix.com> <Karni06-3011941132070001@mac_rbk_3.chem.ucla.edu> <3bkh1m$ifo@icebox.mfltd.co.uk> <3bkos8$29r@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: crocus-fddi.csv.warwick.ac.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit