Article View: talk.environment
Article #1073Disposable vs. Reusable serviceware
From: Ilia Gimelfarb
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 00:00
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 00:00
45 lines
3763 bytes
3763 bytes
Hi, I am trying to compare the environmental and economic impact of using disposable polystyrene (styrofoam) and reusable (either china or reusable plastic) dishes and cups. I have had a very difficult time finding scientific sources of information and I was hoping that someone could point me in the right direction. The most useful source i found so far is "Reusable and Disposable Cups: An Energy-Based Evaluation" by Martin Hocking. It attempts to do Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) but i dind't find a description of what it included (raw material extraction costs, raw material trasport, processing, transport to place of purchase, transport to place of use, use cost, disposal transport and cost). I tried to figure out which factors were included by looking up Hocking's "paper vs. polystryrene" 1991 article is science, but it only stated that a detailed description of data will be publishes separately later. I wasn't able to locate two other sources used that I thought would be helpful: Fenton's "The Winnipeg packaging project: Peport No. 2. Comparison of coffee cups" and van Eijk and other's "Reusable versus disposable. A comparison of the environmental impact of polystyrene, paper/cardboard, and porcelain crockery". This study finds disposables to be in general preferable to reusables. The same is claimed by FPI when citing "Environmental and Public Health Aspects of Reusable and Disposable Foodservice Packaging" by Winston Porter (i couldn't get a hold of this report either - and even though it is claimed that the report is based on 30 others...i couldn't find em). Several other discussions on the issue cite these reports in support of using disposables. Several environmental groups, including edf, claim that other studies come up with drastically different results, but i couldn't identify any studies. I am doing this for a research paper at school and also to determine if my house should be using diposables or reusables...as well as just to learn about the issue. It is definitely much more complex than i first thought and i would really like to get access to some primary sources of data so that i can take into account everything and come up with something. It seems hard to believe that total energy costs (forgetting other things) are actually lower for foam cup than for washing a reusable plate. Anyway, i appologize for the lenght of this message and would appreciate any feedback. If you have access to sources that may be helpful it would be great, but your general thoughts would also be appreciated. You can e-mail me at ig26@cornell.edu. Thank you
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<81aa7f$i7d$1@news01.cit.cornell.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fb58e,a2bf80c3d0ddfec2,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfb58e,public X-Google-Thread: 10df74,a2bf80c3d0ddfec2,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public X-Google-Thread: 10c480,a2bf80c3d0ddfec2,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10c480,public X-Google-Thread: fb19c,a2bf80c3d0ddfec2,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfb19c,public X-Google-Thread: 10607c,a2bf80c3d0ddfec2,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10607c,public From: "Ilia Gimelfarb" <g_ilia@usa.net> Subject: Disposable vs. Reusable serviceware Date: 1999/11/21 Message-ID: <81aa7f$i7d$1@news01.cit.cornell.edu> X-Deja-AN: 551470702 Sender: verified_for_usenet@cornell.edu (ig26 on 209150225072.clarityconnect.com) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@news01.cit.cornell.edu X-Trace: news01.cit.cornell.edu 943238191 18669 209.150.225.72 (22 Nov 1999 02:36:31 GMT) Organization: Cornell University NNTP-Posting-Date: 22 Nov 1999 02:36:31 GMT Newsgroups: talk.environment,aus.environment.misc,ca.environment,sci.environment,sci.environment.waste