🚀 go-pugleaf

"D. Braun" <dbraun@u.washington.edu> wrote:

[edited]

>And similar to his asserting that there is no evidence
>that extinctions have ocurred in large forest areas that have been
>destroyed in tropical forest regions, because exhaustive sientific
>taxonomic studies were not completed before said forests were destroyed.

Proof that you misrepresent what others have posted, becuase you have
no logical response, added to an apparent inability to find the
library.  

I guess I should have known you were not through with your personal
attacks.  For people who have missed some of his past attacks, these
are gleaned from a few past posts:

"fondness for mixing hypotheses with facts."
"claimed that he is well-read in the sciences"
"You are being purposely obtuse."
"you are making up "facts","
"Your sophomoronic propaganda is really laughable."
"Are you obtuse, or just thick?"
"Ssooooo tiresome..."
"Let's stop wasting time replying to this self-defined whiny
ideologue..."
And my personal favorite:
"Go back to school"

More on Deja News, if you have a masochistic streak.

I would have hoped that you would gain some maturity.  I hope, if your
school is unfortunate enough to consider granting you a degree, you
can withold your usual snide comments for a short while.  Or maybe it
would be best if you did not, actually.
Regards, Harold
------
"By September 1979, all important life in the sea was extinct. 
Large areas of coastline had to be evacuated...  A pretty grim 
scenario. Unfortunately were a long way into it already...based 
on projections of trends already appearing..."
   - Paul Ehrilich, Environmental Handbook, 1970, pp 174