Article View: talk.environment
Article #1168Re: Bashford says: Ozone confuses me.
From: Greig Ebeling
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 1997 00:00
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 1997 00:00
40 lines
3056 bytes
3056 bytes
Jonathan Shanklin <j.shanklin@bas.ac.uk> wrote: >I can vouch from personal experience the link between low ozone values >and increased uv having just returned from the Antarctic. When I left >the UK in early November data was suggesting that the ozone hole was >nearly over. Whilst carrying out cargo work at Port Lochroy on a day >with much cirrostratus and thin altostratus most of the ship's company >suffered sun-burn to a greater or lesser extent, even those wearing >blocking cream. A subsequent radiosonde flight revealed low >stratospheric temperatures suggesting that the ozone hole had returned >and on my return to the UK inspection of satellite imagery showed that >the ozone hole was over the area at the time. This is contrary to my own experience. Whilst visiting Cradle Mountain in Tasmania during January, I experienced an unusually clear day, just some cirrus clouds. On that day, Tassie papers were reporting extreme UV, and on returning to Sydney, I checked the latest satellite imagery, which showed that the breaking up of the ozone hole was forcing ozone poor air north over Tasmania. I spent over 6 hours in the sun whilst hiking, with only a cap on, and no sun-screen (I didn't expect the sunshine). I did not get burnt at all. If I had spent that amount of time in the sun in Sydney, then I would have looked like a beetroot. Despite ozone depletion, I am safer from UVR in Tassie than in Sydney. ie ozone depletion does not necessitate increased likelihood of UVR induced cancer. I am also a keen skier. When skiing in the Snowy Mountains, between Sydney and Melbourne, if the sun is out I lather on the sun-screen and cover up. This is not because the UV is high, but because snow reflects UVR very efficiently, and will increase exposure manifold. Whilst I do not argue that UVR does not increase in Antarctica, I humbly suggest that your experience in Antarctica, Jon, and the spurious statistic which suggests UV levels are the same as in San Diego, may be due to reflected UVR, rather than solely due to increased UV-B due to ozone depletion. ...Greig
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5dgb4i$sj$1@coffee.DIALix.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<5cr1ob$1rl$1@coffee.DIALix.COM> <5ctpfe$d7q@usenet.rpi.edu> <5d4efo$72t$1@coffee.DIALix.COM> <32F9EA98.41C6@bas.ac.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10df0c,a7a84d47f994444 X-Google-Attributes: gid10df0c,public X-Google-Thread: 10c480,a7a84d47f994444 X-Google-Attributes: gid10c480,public X-Google-Thread: 10607c,a7a84d47f994444 X-Google-Attributes: gid10607c,public X-Google-Thread: fb58e,a7a84d47f994444 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb58e,public X-Google-Thread: fdaee,a7a84d47f994444 X-Google-Attributes: gidfdaee,public From: eggsoft@sydney.dialix.oz.au (Greig Ebeling) Subject: Re: Bashford says: Ozone confuses me. Date: 1997/02/08 Message-ID: <5dgb4i$sj$1@coffee.DIALix.COM> X-Deja-AN: 215177413 references: <5cr1ob$1rl$1@coffee.DIALix.COM> <5ctpfe$d7q@usenet.rpi.edu> <5d4efo$72t$1@coffee.DIALix.COM> <32F9EA98.41C6@bas.ac.uk> organization: DIALix Services, Sydney, Australia. newsgroups: talk.environment,sci.environment,aus.politics,aus.environment.conservation,aus.environment.misc