🚀 go-pugleaf

> It would appear that "Mike Asher" is a fictitous entity.  A
> week ago, I got a message from Cameron Spitzer that "Mike
> Asher" was a payed wise use propaganda mouthpiece . . .

=o= Interesting.  That might go some ways to explaining about
all these subjects cross-posted to inappropriate newsgroups
such as alt.politics.greens and alt.save.the.earth . . . from
the sheer volume of off-topic messages crossposted there, I
had a notion that *somebody* was trolling those newsgroups.

=o= Could we all be really careful about our followups?  Like,
if "Mike Asher" or somesuch starts up a thread cross-posted to
lots of newsgroups, could we only followup to newsgroups where
the thread is relevant?  Theoretical talk about clearcuts is
relevant to talk.environment, but not to alt.politics.greens
(which is about the Green Party specifically) and not to
alt.save.the.earth (which is about daily nuts-and-bolts how-to
stuff, not open-ended theoretical discussions).
    <_Jym_>