🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: talk.environment
Article #1752

Re: Forestry Policy Proposal

#1752
From: M. W. Smith
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 1995 17:04
55 lines
3452 bytes
In article <Pine.A32.3.90.950313194700.65400B-100000@srv1.freenet.calgary.ab.ca> Peter Abramowicz <crag@freenet.calgary.ab.ca> writes:
>From: Peter Abramowicz <crag@freenet.calgary.ab.ca>
>Subject: Forestry Policy Proposal
>Date: Mon, 13 Mar 1995 23:02:24 -0700 (MST)


>The following statement on forest management for Alberta is the result of
>discussions among Calgary area environmental groups in response to the
>forestry crisis in Alberta. We offer it to the environmental community for 
>comments and discussion.

>It is our hope that this statement can form the basis for a general 
>consensus on forest policy within Alberta. The statement was compiled by 
>Peter Abramowicz and Stuart Baldwin.

>Please send your comments and reactions to this statement to: 

>                crag@freenet.calgary.ab.ca

>INTERIM RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT OF ALBERTA'S FORESTS, 
>PUBLIC AND PRIVATE

SNIP!

>SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS

SNIP!

>               c)   Riparian Buffers within Managed Areas.  These are
>                    meant to safeguard water quality.  A 300 m buffer on
>                    each stream bank is suggested.

What happens if all the streams in a watershed are 295 m apart?

SNIP!

>          3)   Logging practices must be based on the biological
>               requirements of ecosystem-specific plant and animal
>               species. In most cases selective logging techniques
>               should be favoured over clear-cutting, since selective
>               logging can maintain healthy forests and at the same time
>               eliminate the need for "reforestation". It also allows for
>               other uses of the forests at the same time.

What would you do in an even-aged stand of lodgepole pine, a shade-intolerant 
species that can't regenerate under its own canopy?  Wouldn't selective 
logging would eliminate this species?

SNIP!
   _____________________________________________________________________
>  |  Calgary Rainforest Action Group   |   brought to you by:           |
>  |  Connaught PO Box 23069            |   Peter Abramowicz             |
>  |  Calgary, AB  T2S 3B1              |   (403) 270-2604               |
>  |  tel. (403) 295-8666               |   crag@freenet.calgary.ab.ca   |
>   ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID: <mursmith.2.001C6C7D@unixg.ubc.ca>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!news.mindlink.net!vanbc.wimsey.com!unixg.ubc.ca!port64.annex6.net.ubc.ca!mursmith
References: <Pine.A32.3.90.950313194700.65400B-100000@srv1.freenet.calgary.ab.ca>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10607c,d995b005247505e6
X-Google-Attributes: gid10607c,public
X-Google-Thread: fb58e,d995b005247505e6
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb58e,public
X-Google-Thread: 110a63,d995b005247505e6
X-Google-Attributes: gid110a63,public
X-Google-Thread: 106b31,d995b005247505e6
X-Google-Attributes: gid106b31,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-03-15 17:22:53 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!news.mindlink.net!vanbc.wimsey.com!unixg.ubc.ca!port64.annex6.net.ubc.ca!mursmith
From: mursmith@unixg.ubc.ca (M. W. Smith)
Newsgroups: talk.environment,bionet.agroforestry,alt.politics.greens,sci.environment
Subject: Re: Forestry Policy Proposal
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 1995 17:04:26 UNDEFINED
Organization: The University of British Columbia
Lines: 58
Message-ID: <mursmith.2.001C6C7D@unixg.ubc.ca>
References: <Pine.A32.3.90.950313194700.65400B-100000@srv1.freenet.calgary.ab.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: port64.annex6.net.ubc.ca
X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev B]