Article View: talk.environment
Article #1752Re: Forestry Policy Proposal
From: M. W. Smith
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 1995 17:04
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 1995 17:04
55 lines
3452 bytes
3452 bytes
In article <Pine.A32.3.90.950313194700.65400B-100000@srv1.freenet.calgary.ab.ca> Peter Abramowicz <crag@freenet.calgary.ab.ca> writes: >From: Peter Abramowicz <crag@freenet.calgary.ab.ca> >Subject: Forestry Policy Proposal >Date: Mon, 13 Mar 1995 23:02:24 -0700 (MST) >The following statement on forest management for Alberta is the result of >discussions among Calgary area environmental groups in response to the >forestry crisis in Alberta. We offer it to the environmental community for >comments and discussion. >It is our hope that this statement can form the basis for a general >consensus on forest policy within Alberta. The statement was compiled by >Peter Abramowicz and Stuart Baldwin. >Please send your comments and reactions to this statement to: > crag@freenet.calgary.ab.ca >INTERIM RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT OF ALBERTA'S FORESTS, >PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SNIP! >SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS SNIP! > c) Riparian Buffers within Managed Areas. These are > meant to safeguard water quality. A 300 m buffer on > each stream bank is suggested. What happens if all the streams in a watershed are 295 m apart? SNIP! > 3) Logging practices must be based on the biological > requirements of ecosystem-specific plant and animal > species. In most cases selective logging techniques > should be favoured over clear-cutting, since selective > logging can maintain healthy forests and at the same time > eliminate the need for "reforestation". It also allows for > other uses of the forests at the same time. What would you do in an even-aged stand of lodgepole pine, a shade-intolerant species that can't regenerate under its own canopy? Wouldn't selective logging would eliminate this species? SNIP! _____________________________________________________________________ > | Calgary Rainforest Action Group | brought to you by: | > | Connaught PO Box 23069 | Peter Abramowicz | > | Calgary, AB T2S 3B1 | (403) 270-2604 | > | tel. (403) 295-8666 | crag@freenet.calgary.ab.ca | > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<mursmith.2.001C6C7D@unixg.ubc.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!news.mindlink.net!vanbc.wimsey.com!unixg.ubc.ca!port64.annex6.net.ubc.ca!mursmithReferences:
<Pine.A32.3.90.950313194700.65400B-100000@srv1.freenet.calgary.ab.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10607c,d995b005247505e6 X-Google-Attributes: gid10607c,public X-Google-Thread: fb58e,d995b005247505e6 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb58e,public X-Google-Thread: 110a63,d995b005247505e6 X-Google-Attributes: gid110a63,public X-Google-Thread: 106b31,d995b005247505e6 X-Google-Attributes: gid106b31,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-03-15 17:22:53 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!news.mindlink.net!vanbc.wimsey.com!unixg.ubc.ca!port64.annex6.net.ubc.ca!mursmith From: mursmith@unixg.ubc.ca (M. W. Smith) Newsgroups: talk.environment,bionet.agroforestry,alt.politics.greens,sci.environment Subject: Re: Forestry Policy Proposal Date: Wed, 15 Mar 1995 17:04:26 UNDEFINED Organization: The University of British Columbia Lines: 58 Message-ID: <mursmith.2.001C6C7D@unixg.ubc.ca> References: <Pine.A32.3.90.950313194700.65400B-100000@srv1.freenet.calgary.ab.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: port64.annex6.net.ubc.ca X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev B]