🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <3C028943.27E23AD7@rockymountaineers.com>, Amos Keppler 
<amoskeppler@rockymountaineers.com> writes
>John Beardmore wrote:
>> In article <3C0000A2.158810AF@rockymountaineers.com>, Amos Keppler
>> <amoskeppler@rockymountaineers.com> writes

>> >CHEMICAL WARFARE
>>
>> Wot ???  Reposting your the same old ill argued half truth again ?
>>
>> Why not check out deja to see what was wrong with it last time ?
>>
>
> It was nothing wrong with it last time either.

Except the content, the details, the supposition...


> The wrongdoing is how
>the horrible truths it's describing are allowed to continue and
>escalate.
>
> http://www.midnight-fire.net/theweeklyreport/cocktail.html

Well yes -  anything there that isn't science fiction ?


> I don't need to check out deja. I remember your "arguments" quite well
>from the last time.

Yet you churn out the same old crap without dealing with the issues
raised !


> One should look far and long to find a worse line of diversionary
>tactics.

You should look far and long to address the shortcomings of your 
argument !


> They weren't worth replying to.

So why did you try ?


> Will you ever attempt to actually reply to the material, instead of
>doing your utmost to avoid it?

I had no problem reading with it.  I just can't agree with your 
conclusions which don't seem to be well founded on the very limited 
facts you present.

Anyway -  don't you have anything original to say, or will we be treated 
to this every year like the ghost of christmas past ?


J/.
-- 
John Beardmore