Article View: talk.environment
Article #1992Canada's water gets poor grades
From: J Wootton
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 16:52
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 16:52
114 lines
4897 bytes
4897 bytes
http://www.canoe.ca/LondonNews/lf.lf-01-18-0001.html Thursday, January 18, 2001 Canada's water gets poor grades By JONATHAN SHER, Free Press Reporter Another Walkerton tragedy looms in Canadian taps despite a deluge of rules in Ontario since last year's E. coli outbreak, a report warns. The deadly outbreak last May killed seven, sickened 2,300, and pushed the Ontario government to pass regulations that vaulted the province from a near-failing grade to tops in Canada when it comes to drinking water, a report written by the Sierra Legal Defence Fund says. But Queen's Park officials get an incomplete grade at best from those in Walkerton who survived Canada's worst tainted water outbreak. The report, called Waterproof: Canada's Drinking Water Report Card, grades provinces on a number of factors, including how well they: - Protect sources of drinking water. - Test and treat water. - Inform the public about water quality. New rules won't protect anyone if the province doesn't enforce them, said Bruce Davidson, spokesperson for the Concerned Walkerton Citizens group. "It's like having a radar gun without police," he said. Ontario's track record for enforcement is poor, Davidson said. Testimony at the inquiry showed officials with the public utilities commission breaking rules for 20 years without being caught. Elsewhere in Canada the outlook is bleak. According to the Sierra report, no province earned higher than a B (Ontario's grade), many hovering just above failing. "In the absence of a comprehensive, cross-country approach to protecting drinking water, more tragedies almost certainly await us," says the report, to be released today but obtained earlier by The Free Press. When it comes to drinking water, Canada lags far behind the United States and even behind its own guidelines. Only Alberta, Quebec and Nova Scotia have adopted as standards Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water. "To avoid future disease outbreaks, these deficiencies must be remedied," the report states. Canada must spend more to upgrade aging water systems, but the opposite is happening, the report contends. Provincial governments have passed the responsibility for clean water to municipalities, which then turn to private companies that aren't accountable to the public. Ontario officials have made strides to improve regulations but, prior to Walkerton, would have received a D, the report says. Even with those improvements, some of which won't be in place until next year, Ontario fails to adequately protect the sources of drinking water in wells or watersheds, the report says. The report calls for a national regulatory framework comparable to one in the United States and recommends: - Creating mandatory drinking water protection. - Protecting the source of water in watersheds and wellfields. - Requiring training and certification for operators of public systems. - Enacting stringent reporting requirements and right-to-know provisions for consumers of water. - Allowing citizens the right to sue jurisdictions that fail to meet water standards. - Increasing federal funding to build and repair infrastructure, with funding contingent on meeting water protection requirements. Officials believe the outbreak in Walkerton occurred after manure-laden surface water washed into a well from a nearby farm during a torrential rainstorm. CANADA'S WATER REPORT CARD ALTA. - B QUE. - B ONT. PRE-WALKERTON - D ONT. POST-WALKERTON - B N.S. - B- N.W.T. - C NUN. - C SASK. - C MAN. - C- N.B. - C- B.C. - D NFLD. - D Y.T. - D- P.E.I. - F
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3A672052.FC6E0AF0@home.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!newshub2.rdc1.sfba.home.com!news.home.com!news4.rdc1.on.home.com.POSTED!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fb58e,bfb07136d1884f7e,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfb58e,public X-Google-Thread: fe386,bfb07136d1884f7e,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfe386,public X-Google-Thread: 10df74,bfb07136d1884f7e,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-18 08:54:02 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!newshub2.rdc1.sfba.home.com!news.home.com!news4.rdc1.on.home.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID: <3A672052.FC6E0AF0@home.com> From: J Wootton <jwootton@home.com> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: talk.environment,alt.save.the.earth,ca.environment Subject: Canada's water gets poor grades Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 116 Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 16:52:33 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.112.48.184 X-Complaints-To: abuse@home.net X-Trace: news4.rdc1.on.home.com 979836753 24.112.48.184 (Thu, 18 Jan 2001 08:52:33 PST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 08:52:33 PST Organization: Excite@Home - The Leader in Broadband http://home.com/faster