🚀 go-pugleaf

On Fri, 27 Jul 2001 22:01:53 -0700, sorciere <karen@snowcrest.net>
wrote:

>In article <R222doddofd45fddodod23283@edosreyu.com>, Live Wire
><badluck@uniodowtrs.net> wrote:
>
>> If people are so worried about rare sucker fish and wild pumas
>> and the like why don't they set up fish farms to raise thousands
>> of sucker fish? Why don't they raise pumas in cages? Chickens
>> are raised in cages and we aren't running out of chickens. If
>> you want an animal to survive forever domesticate it. Raise
>> elephants on farms, have 200 hundred kangaroo rat running
>> around wheels in cages making electricity for California.
>> 
>> Or would the NIMBYs not want a warthog farm next door to them?
>
>Warthogs, salmon, sucker fish, etc., don't belong on "farms". They
>belong in their own natural habitat. We (environmentalists) want their
>habitats preserved healthy and whole. Their are "pumas" all around
>where I live. They are much better neighbors than most people.

Plus, it's sort of nice to have wild areas. Seeing them in the movies
is ok, and computers can put them there, but the real thing is even
better.

We should change the water, so you have to take a pill to have a baby.

It's getting too damned crowded for comfort.

Absent that, the Nature Conservancy, which buys wilderness for
preservation at prices owners are willing to take, would seem
something all can get behind.

Tax deductible, I don't work there.