🚀 go-pugleaf

CC: Paul12@beach.com and Usenet
  Yep,  Paul Jensen <Paul12@beach.com> wrote on Wed, 23 Apr 
   Re: Anti-Environmental Texas, Colo. tit-suckers  --  (Wise Use, LPPV)


>Crash wrote:
>> 
>> Anti-environmental tit-suckers    1995-96 Congressional Vote Index,
>> 
>> Anybody who scored higher than 80 is an anti-environmental
>> welefare-for-the-rich government-tit-sucker.  Your representative
>> may surprise you!

>I'm sure you index is a fine index,

Thank you.  It has its uses.  But there are similar indexes put
out by environmental groups that rank our congressmen that I
think would be better for general purpose use.  This one is more
narrow than that, identifying specifically the "welefare-for-the-rich
government-tit-sucking anti-environmentalists."   While this definition
fits all anti-environmentalists, this list particularly targets the
subsidy-seekers pretending to be Conservatives via propaganda mills
and astroturf "grassroots" organizations. 

> but considering the childish manner 
>in which you described your grading scale, it lacks any credibility and 
>is not worth my time examining.  >Paul12@beach.com

Childish?  I fear your description is so vague as to
be utterly useless.  A wild guess is that you found 
"tit-sucking" to be offensive.  I imagine you must
live in a very small world.  You don't like the messenger's,
manner, so you ignore the message?  For you small-minded types,
let me <gag> appologize.  Please consider my statements 
such as: "welefare-for-the-rich government-tit-sucker"
to read: "covert, lying RichBoy-subsidy seeking parasite
of the American taxpayers."  Frankly, I find the more politely
I word it, the wordier and less accurate and concise it becomes.
There is no accurate polite way to say "dispicable person".
     As the Bard said:
"An asshole by any other name smells the same."
--Doug Bashford

"All that was required of them was a    .---.        .------------
primitive patriotism which could be    /     \  __  /    ------
appealed to whenever it was necessary / /     \(  )/    -----
to make them accept longer working   //////   ' \/ `   ---
hours or less wealth.   And even    //// / // :    : ---
when they became discontented,     // /   /  /`    '--
as they sometimes did, their      //          //..\\  
discontent led nowhere,     =====/===========UU====UU=============
because, being with only Company ideas,     '//||\\`
they could only focus it on Company           ''``
scapegoats. The rebellious ones only fought Company enemies.
The source of these evils invariably escaped their notice."
   [Apologies to George Orwell]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
"Until they become conscious they will never rebel, and until
after they  have rebelled they cannot become conscious."
   1984,  George Orwell