🚀 go-pugleaf

  Yep,  seesig@thebeach.edu (Crash) wrote on Thu, 24 Apr 1997 13:55:34
GMT about:
   Anti-Environmental Senators list 3  --  (Wise Use, LPPV) 

>Anti-Environmental Senators list 3  --  (Wise Use, LPPV)
>>Anybody who scored higher than 80 is an anti-environmental
>>welefare-for-the-rich government tit-sucker.  Your representative
>>may surprise you!

>>             1995-96 Congressional Vote Index, 
>>House of Representatives 

>This is the same thing, but this time, the Senators: 
>lppvot00.txt Combined page 3,4,5  -- LPPV 1995-96 SENATE SCORECARD

>    Senator           1  2   3   4  5   6  7   8  9   10  11
>   Alabama
>    Heflin H (D)      S  O   O   O  O   S  O   O  S   S    S  45   45
>    Shelby R (R)      S  S   S  S   S   S  S   S  S   S    S  100  100
>   Alaska
>    Murkowski F (R)   S  S   S   S  S   S  S   S  S   S    S  100  100
>    Stevens T (R)     S  S   S   S  S   S  S   S  S   S    S  100  100
>   Arizona
>    Kyl J (R)         S  S   S   S  S   S  S   S  S   S    S  100  100
>    McCain J (R)      ?  S   S   ?  S   S  S   S  S   S    ?  100  73
>   Arkansas
>    Bumpers D (D)     O  O   O   O  O   O  O   O  O   O    ?  0    0
>    Pryor D (D        O  O   O   O  O   O  O   O  O   O    ?  0    0
>   California
>    Boxer B (D)       O  O   O   O  O   O  O   O  O   O    ?  0    0
>    Feinstein D (D)   O  S   O   O  S   O  O   O  O   O    ?  20   18
>   Colorado
>    Brown H (R)       S  S   S   S  S   S  S   S  S   S    S  100  100
>    Campbell B (R)    O  S   S   S  S   S  S   S  S   S    ?  90   82
>   Connecticut
>    Dodd C (D)        O  O   O   O  O   O  O   O  O   O    ?  0    0
>    Lieberman J (D)   O  O   O   O  O   O  O   O  O   O    ?  0    0
>   Delaware
>    Biden J (D)       O  O   O   O  O   O  O   O  O   O    ?  0    0
>    Roth W (R)        S  S   O   O  S   O  O   S  O   O    ?  40   36
>   Florida
chop

My appologies!  Correction!  
 
>welefare-for-the-rich government tit-sucker.   This is because
>this survey was put out by the "League of Private Property Voters",
>the best funded of the "Wise Use"  anti-environmental
>welefare-for-the-rich government tit-sucking propaganda agencies.
>They (like all of the "Wise Use" propaganda mills) are best known as
>anti-environmental Chicken Little pork & subsidy-swilling kneejerks
>pretending to be Conservatives.

>If you are interested in learning more about Wise Use or the
>League of Private Property Voters (LPPV), you can read their
>own propaganda, and their full Congressional Vote Index with 
>all their excuses, I mean details and explanations at:
>http://www.psnw.com/~bashford/e-sust-f.html
   WRONG!!!  That is the General Sustainability Formula.  Instead try:
 http://www.psnw.com/~bashford/e-pp-ful.html
>To learn about them is to learn about the main thrust of American
>anti-environmentalism; War on the Environment.

>-    We are seeking to increase individuals' wealth and freedom
>-   rather than stimulating the economy.  We look to abundance
>-    and wholeness instead of so-called; "economic growth".
>-   Growthmania consumes what it promises.  Ecology delivers.
>--  Douglas   bashford at psnw dot com -- Middle-of-the-road extremist.
>Science, Ecology, Economics, Environment, and Politics (title)
>http://www.psnw.com/~bashford/e-index.html
>  See Mother Nature revealing her tits and getting pissed off:
>  http://www.psnw.com/~bashford/e-ma-nat.html

>Disclaimer: I am responsible for every word I utter.