🚀 go-pugleaf

[IMG]http://i135.photobucket.com/albums/q141/stevephotobucket/IMG_0118.jpg[/IMG]


http://s135.photobucket.com/albums/q141/stevephotobucket/?action=view&current=IMG_0118.jpg


This is from 27 days near my furnace in mostly moderate air , now double
that in bad air days. This is less then one month, multiply that by years
and you get an idea what people are breathin and why they are poisoning
people in NE. Why we might even have 34,000 kids everyday not going to
school. Why one in five kids in some areas of ne are needing asthma meds.
Here is your proof.



"mcs" <mcsantpollution@yahoo.com> wrote in message 
news:XYObh.13213$ki3.10312@trndny01...
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/hsn/20060921/hl_hsn/pollutedairmightincreasestrokerisk
>>> >
>>> >>> http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/22/us/22soot.html
>>> >>>
>>> >>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/21/AR2006092101616.html
>>> >
>>> >>> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15196924/
>>> >
>>> > http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061103/ap_on_sc/un_greenhouse_gases
>
> http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?art...1383414B7F0000
>
> http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6556413
>
>
> its simple as that. Results prove people down wind from these levels have
> lower quality of life and longevity and are systematically dying for Pres
> and coal companies and car companies. Simple changes to protect people are
> too hard to make while people are being poisoned to death. no different 
> then
> the guy from Britain who use to be KGB
> What they call global warming , I call in addition to rising co2 levels , 
> poisoning
> In addition to close to 400 murders in my city , we have some of the 
> highest rates for asthma and cancers and heart disease in the nation. We 
> are number 2 in asthma, 32000 kids take off from school in our area called 
> playing hooky and when parents were told why its important for their kids 
> to attend some said it was because of asthma and I can reinforce its 
> almost imporssible to concentrate let alone breath or go to school. and 
> our Supreme Court actually has to debate this.?  Trees are down where I 
> walk I need meds only because of rising rates of pollution I monitor and 
> our press calls beautiful days? For five days our pollution was out of the 
> good zone into moderate the kind wher I automatically can't breahe in and 
> they want me to work? ? . I defy anyone to tell me this is healthy for 
> anyone. I need meds in direct correlation to pollution increases that they 
> call moderate. I call it slow poisoning by government.
> This is the protection we get from our govt? when they say beautiful , 
> and when this beautiful is polluted with high
> particulates ..  is air that has caused many many deaths sooner
> compared to others who didn't get it and they call this beautiful? This is
> the air we get more then most people in the US and we have no athletes
> winning here, or wanting to play here (some wanted to leave when they
> realized what they were breathin), we have huge rates of prescription drug
> use and huge amounts spent for health care, where we have F rated air by
> Lung Association., where we are one of the most violent places on earth.
> Where we are number 2 for asthma, where our kids have air that is f rated?
> . They all smile
> saying
> its warm and beautiful while athletes and politicians and newscasters have
> more cancers and illnesss and no one cares. they ignore it while getting
> paid by drug companies. The hidden
> dangers besides crime is particulates and its lethal and killing people 
> who
> have to breathe it. When news whores tell you this is beautiful you 
> realize
> freedom means its ok to now kill people. Its funny what tv tells you what 
> to
> be concerned about like swimming in chorlinated water but not worried 
> about
> breathing polluted air where there are tens of studies to show the
> correlations of rising asthma and what particulate pollution does to 
> people
> especially over time.. what if people knew you are being poisoned by gov
> policies
> that allow particulates to kill people sooner then those that don't get 
> it.
> Our supreme court is going to take up this issue to determine if the epa 
> has
> the authoritey to regulate this toxins.Or at least if they should mandated 
> by Congress Our beloved President who is suppose
> to protect us, promised he would regulate co2 but after election he 
> changed his mind and now incredibly enough is siding with car companies 
> who don't want any changes. This is the leader who is suppose to protect 
> us? While millions can't breathe? This is murder and poisoning going on. I 
> don't think our Supreme Court is going to protect siding with possibly 
> saving our children. Our system is corrupted by millionaires and 
> conservative people who are selling us down the sewer for profits.  Like I 
> really have faith in our conservative Surpeme court to
> protect us after they allowed this for so long? NOT.
>
>
> Fearless Galapagos iguanas too cool for their own Weather and climate
>
> Climate change sceptics lose vital argument
>    More info: Gulf Stream weakened in 'Little Ice Age' (Nature)
> FAO report: Farm animals responsible for almost 1/5 of global warming 
> gasses
>
> EPA Scientists File Mass Petition For Action On Global Warming
> Supreme Court Hears Its First Global Warming Case (update)
>    Related: Texas backs EPA in high court case
>                  Ecological Society of America Statement on US Supreme 
> Court Case
> EU outlines new, tougher carbon permits
> The theory of global climate change, however, is pretty well backed up
> by the data.
>
> Especially the data compiled since the 1980s by the World
> Meteorological Organization, the US - based National Climatic Data
> Center, the US National Academy of Sciences and the Goddard Space
> Flight Center of NASA, among other institutions that follow the
> climate.  This data shows greenhouse gas levels to be rising steadily,
> and global average temperatures to be rising more or less in sync with
> the greenhouse gas concentrations.  Pretty much as the theory of
> "greenhouse warming" suggests, albeit with some complications.
>
> Then there's other data that a variety of different scientific
> researchers have unearthed over the past 10 years of so.  This data
> provides circumstantial, but not direct, evidence that significant
> climate change caused by greenhouse gases is now underway.  Some
> examples:
>
> *  The earlier onset of the spring flowering season and the later
> occurrence of fall frosts in England, which have extended the average
> English growing season by something like 21 days over the past few
> decades.
>
> * The rise in average temperatures in Alaska and Siberia of around 4-7
> degrees that's been observed over the past several decades, and that is
> already leading to the melting of the permafrost in some places.
>
> *  The significant shrinkage of the Arctic ice sheet over the past few
> decades, so that the extent of Arctic ice in the summers is something
> like 21 percent less than it was 50 years ago.
>
> *  The collapse of the Larsen Ice Sheet in Western Antarctica a few
> years back, and new research that suggests that with the fringes of the
> Antarctic ice sheet breaking up, the speed of the great Antarctic
> glaciers from the interior of the continent towards the sea is
> accelerating.
>
> *  The retreat of mountain glaciers in many places around the world
> over the past two or three decades, indicating that global warming is
> already underway -- although the mere fact the mountain glaciers are
> melting, of course, doesn't necessarily prove that CO2 and other
> greenhouse gases (methane, nitrous oxide, etc.) are the culprits.
>
> *  An apparent slowing of the thermohaline circulation system in the
> North Atlantic over the past decade, which may or may not be evidence
> that global warming is leading towards a "Day After Tomorrow" scenario.
> That is, a situation resembling the one which apparently occurred back
> in the "Younger Dryas Event" of around 11,500 years ago, when melting
> glaciers released enough fresh water into the ocean off Greenland to
> basically shut down the Gulf Stream, triggering sharply colder weather
> conditions in Western Europe.
>
> *  Other data that seems to confirm the theory of global climate change
> includes the increased incidence of "extreme" weather events in the
> United States, Australia and some other places -- "extreme" weather
> events such as severe flooding, heavy winter snowstorms and intense
> droughts and heat waves, for example
>
> Such "extreme" weather events are pretty much predicted by the GW
> simulation models, as NYT science reporter William Stevens points out
> in his 1999 book "The Change in the Weather."  Accordingly, the fact
> that we're now seeing these weather extremes -- viz., last summer's
> California wildfires, the clusters of Midwestern tornadoes we've seen
> in recent years -- is yet another indication that GW seems to be
> underway.
>
> All of these pieces of EMPIRICAL DATA, I think, are evidence that the
> logical model that the scientists have constructed of global climate
> change is basically accurate.
>
>
>