🚀 go-pugleaf

>Iain Jameson <Iain.Jamesonx@dsto.defence.gov.au> writes:

>> David Moss wrote:
>> > 
>> > rsilva@dove.net.au (Rob Silva) writes:
>> > 
> 
>> Fine, as long as you understand we will fight you every step to the
>> road to legalising voluntary euthanasia.
>> 
>> 
>> > RTI is not about "the right to die" as many of its proponents claim.
>> > We already have a god-given (or natural if you prefer) right to die
>> > which every one of us will one day exercise. RTI is about the right
>> > to kill. IMHO that right should be as limited, tightly controlled and
>> > if possible, never exercised. RTI would make it commonplace.
>> > 
>> 
>> Yes it is. Again with this 'god-given' thingy.
>> You have no right forcing this 'god-given' thiungy onto anyone
>> who does not believe it, or want it. 


>Interesting that you should focus on "god given" instead of "natural" 
>which is in parenthesis and might be in this case considered an defining
>term.  I think most reasonable people would see "god given" as the vernacular
>of "natural" in this context.  Is this some sort of counter bigottry bigottry?

Because David means 'god-given'. Or at least that's how he comes
across.
Perhaps David should never have used the 'god given' expression 
if he didn't mean it.

What you think is just your opinion. 

>> 
>> > David Moss,
>> > personal opinion only.
>> 
>> Which is the whole point. So please stop forcing your personal opinions
>> and religion onto people who don't want them.
>> 

>I consider you to be forcing your opinions down my throat.
>Kindly stop it.


How can I be Jan? I did say please!


>Unless of course you are willing to support freedom of speach.


What? Like you are supporting freedom of choice?

I'm quite happy for you and David to have opinions. That's your right.
Try reading the whole thread before saying otherwise.

It's your belief that no one is allowed choice that annoys me.

The choice to voluntary end your own life in particular.
You have no right to deny me, or anyone else, that choice.

>Jan


Iain.