🚀 go-pugleaf

Jeremy Paul Anderson <jpanders@taurus.oac.uci.edu> wrote:

>On Tue, 29 Oct 1996, Edward Gerk wrote:
>

>As has been pointed out at least twice before, this sort of
>inconsistency is so trivial as to be unworthy of serious attention. If
>someone on your side of the euthanasia/suicide debate committed a
>similar error, I wouldn't give a rat's ass.  Your attempt to make a
>mountain out of this mole hill says more about you than it does about
>Hofsess: it makes you look petty, and invites the suspicion that you
>have nothing substantial to support your prohibitionist stance. Get
>off it, Ted;  aren't there bigger fish to fry? 

Jeremy:

You miss an important point.  That is that the statements I point out
are all part of the criticism pointed at others, that THEY did not
have their story straight.  I pointed out something that was a lie.  I
was called a liar for doing that.  I merely responded by showing that
what I said was true.

I am sorry if this offends you.  Take me off your Christmas card list.
By me a plastic bag if it makes you happy. (please include the
instructions, but I want the bag with the velcro strips, does it come
in colors?)

Ted