🚀 go-pugleaf

Richard Nash <akoobra@weblink.solutions.net.au> writes:

> David Moss wrote:
> 
>  Ashraf Ghebranious <axg708@anu.edu.au> wrote:
> 
>  >The biggest supporters of the Andrews bill are the so called christians.
>  >I wonder if they had been in the garden with christ on the night he knew

[snip]

>  >going to die. He opted to die.
> 
>  I read he pleaded to be spared right up to the end.
> 
>  >Of course, in modern day Australia,
>  >thanks to the senate, that would be illegal.
> 
>  As it was back then. Read it again. There was a legal framework in
>  place to regulate killing in the Roman empire. They had their own
>  "slippery slope" however and it was only too easy to sidestep the
>  regulations and put an unpopular, vulnerable person to death.
>  If you think human nature has changed in the last 2000 years, I
>  suggest you open your eyes once in a while.
> 
> No I suggest that you let people decide what to do and don't use
> religous rhetoric as if you are better than everybody else.  You sort of

Just where is the religious rhetoric?  David's response to Ashrafs anti
Christian comments, the only "religious" content here, seems to be
more of a historical nature. 

> person sickens me with your innate belief in good and right, if it
> wasn't for people like you the world would be a much better place to
> live.
> 
 
How so please explain.



Jan