Thread View: talk.euthanasia
2 messages
2 total messages
Started by Iain Jameson
Wed, 22 Jan 1997 00:00
Re: Euthanasia = murder?
Author: Iain Jameson
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 1997 00:00
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 1997 00:00
51 lines
1928 bytes
1928 bytes
>Iain Jameson <Iain.Jamesonx@dsto.defence.gov.au> writes: >> jan@orchide.dialix.oz.au (jan) wrote : >> >> >Iain Jameson <Iain.Jamesonx@dsto.defence.gov.au> writes: >> >> >> David Moss wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> >> No one was killed. Obviously you do not understand Euthanasia. >> >> Fortunately plenty of people do, and are happy to be able to choose the >> >> time and place of their death. Their choice. >> >> >She's alive is she? Must be no one was killed. >> >> >Jan >> >> You are being totally clueless on purpose, aren't you Jan. >> >> Go on, admit it, we don't mind. > Of course I admit it. Coming from someone who can > say that Euthanasia has nothing to with killing > "clueless" has to be the highest complement. >Jan Only in your dreams Jan. We have gone over this more than once. The fact you bring it up again proves my point. You have no idea, and are either very naive or purposely dense. And quite possibly both. Whatever the truth is, your original reply was silly and still is. As is your follow up reply. It's obvious you have no arguements to offer here. Iain. --- Remove any x's from my email address if you feel the need to email me.
Re: Euthanasia = murder?
Author: jan
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 1997 00:00
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 1997 00:00
43 lines
1861 bytes
1861 bytes
Iain Jameson <Iain.Jamesonx@dsto.defence.gov.au> writes: > >Iain Jameson <Iain.Jamesonx@dsto.defence.gov.au> writes: > > >> jan@orchide.dialix.oz.au (jan) wrote : > >> > > > Of course I admit it. Coming from someone who can > > say that Euthanasia has nothing to with killing > > "clueless" has to be the highest complement. > > Only in your dreams Jan. > Let me make it clear to you remember your "Ethanasia has nothing to do with killing" it is a fallacy of a similar form as "Clueless has nothing to do with ignorance" Therefore it must be a compliment. If you want to be taken at all seriously you need to understand that the pragmatics of communication demand at least some consensus on the meaning of the words used. Otherwise no-one can really be sure what you are saying. This paragraph will have liitle meaning to you of course because "Pragmatics has nothing to do with practicality". "Communication has nothing to do with sharing information" "Consensus has nothing to do with agreement" "Sure has nothing to do with certainty" You can see why I don't take you seriously at all not that I think you care as long as the debate gets bogged down in semantics. Jan Jan
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads