Re: Euthanasia = murder?

Thread View: talk.euthanasia

2 messages

[T] Back to Threads [V] Tree View [G] Group Articles

2 total messages Started by Iain Jameson Thu, 16 Jan 1997 00:00

#266

Author: Iain Jameson
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1997 00:00

26 lines
1304 bytes

jan@orchide.dialix.oz.au (jan) wrote :

>Iain Jameson <Iain.Jamesonx@dsto.defence.gov.au> writes:

>> David Moss wrote:
>> > 
>> 
>> No one was killed. Obviously you do not understand Euthanasia.
>> Fortunately plenty of people do, and are happy to be able to choose the
>> time and place of their death. Their choice.

>She's alive is she?  Must be no one was killed.

>Jan

You are being totally clueless on purpose, aren't you Jan.

Go on, admit it, we don't mind.

Then again, you could just admit you have no valid
counter arguements.

I base this on your other posts.

Iain.

Re: Euthanasia = murder?

#265

Author: jan
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1997 00:00

29 lines
1366 bytes

Iain Jameson <Iain.Jamesonx@dsto.defence.gov.au> writes:

> jan@orchide.dialix.oz.au (jan) wrote :
> 
> >Iain Jameson <Iain.Jamesonx@dsto.defence.gov.au> writes:
> 
> >> David Moss wrote:
> >> > 
> >> 
> >> No one was killed. Obviously you do not understand Euthanasia.
> >> Fortunately plenty of people do, and are happy to be able to choose the
> >> time and place of their death. Their choice.
> 
> >She's alive is she?  Must be no one was killed.
> 
> >Jan
> 
> You are being totally clueless on purpose, aren't you Jan.
> 
> Go on, admit it, we don't mind.

Of course I admit it.  Coming from someone who can
say that Euthanasia has nothing to with killing 
"clueless" has to be the highest complement.



Jan

Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads