Re: San Francisco EXEMPT from California smog checks!!

Article View: talk.rumors

Article #562

#562

From: Larry Alpert
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2002 05:53

34 lines
2670 bytes

"Michael Wise" <nospam@no.spam> wrote in message
news:nospam-11FE6F.21542403072002@news.easynews.com...
> In article <3lg7iuk09v3vmr3vlsaktob8igo7cvbqef@news.supernews.com>,
>  "trebor@sirius.com.no.more" <user@example.com> wrote:
> As it is now, not everybody in SF is exempt in all situations. I
> recently bought a used car out of state (Washington) and brought it
into
> California (SF). When I went to get it smogged (in preparation for
the
> DMV) the smog people told me that, by law, it would need an
"Enhanced"
> smog check since it was purchased out of state and did not have
license
> plates. I quickly found out that there are only a handful of places
in
> SF which have the proper equipment to do an "Enhanced" smog
check...and
> they all charge 3-4 times what a "regular" smog check costs. I paid
> nearly $100 to get my car smog checked. A complete racket.
>
>
> --Mike

I'm not sure how it is determined when and where an Enhanced smog
check is needed.  I brought in 2 cars from out of state and did not
have to have that done (East Bay).



--
___________________
Lawrence Alpert
Manager, Extrusion
Boston Scientific/Target

Technical Details

Message-ID: <KpRU8.393281$352.51454@sccrnsc02>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!wn1feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.204!attbi_feed4!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!sccrnsc02.POSTED!not-for-mail

References:

<1SDKJDLKJSDLKSDf22@cacacaca.edu> <nospam-28AEBF.20201203072002@news.easynews.com> <3lg7iuk09v3vmr3vlsaktob8igo7cvbqef@news.supernews.com> <nospam-11FE6F.21542403072002@news.easynews.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 110a63,7668f55b611c2f66
X-Google-Attributes: gid110a63,public
X-Google-Thread: f824f,7668f55b611c2f66
X-Google-Attributes: gidf824f,public
X-Google-Thread: fb9af,7668f55b611c2f66
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb9af,public
X-Google-Thread: 10b9bd,7668f55b611c2f66
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b9bd,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-07-03 22:53:47 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!wn1feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.204!attbi_feed4!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!sccrnsc02.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Larry Alpert" <alpertl@attbi.com>
Newsgroups: talk.rumors,talk.politics.libertarian,alt.politics.greens,ba.general
References: <1SDKJDLKJSDLKSDf22@cacacaca.edu> <nospam-28AEBF.20201203072002@news.easynews.com> <3lg7iuk09v3vmr3vlsaktob8igo7cvbqef@news.supernews.com> <nospam-11FE6F.21542403072002@news.easynews.com>
Subject: Re: San Francisco EXEMPT from California smog checks!!
Lines: 38
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700
Message-ID: <KpRU8.393281$352.51454@sccrnsc02>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.235.33.190
X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com
X-Trace: sccrnsc02 1025762026 12.235.33.190 (Thu, 04 Jul 2002 05:53:46 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2002 05:53:46 GMT
Organization: AT&T Broadband
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2002 05:53:47 GMT

Reply to Parent Message