Article View: talk.rumors
Article #567Re: San Francisco EXEMPT from California smog checks!!
From: Michael Wise
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2002 08:53
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2002 08:53
48 lines
3394 bytes
3394 bytes
In article <ihv7iuocuk1nplq5k8ee5g1vncfhenrcu2@4ax.com>, Jak Crow <newsguy@werewolves.org> wrote: > >> >> >> ! Did you know that San Francisco is exempt from the smog > >> >> >> laws that the rest of the state has to follow??? > >> >> > > >> >> >Did you also know that this is because the SF Bay Area has and > >> >> >continues > >> >> >to meet and/or exceed state/federal clean air standards???? > >> >> > >> >> Thanks to an accident of nature that takes our smog and dumps it > >> >> inland. > >> > > >> > > >> >That doesn't change the fact that the SF Bay Area still meets and > >> >exceeds clean air standards. > >> > >> Define "Bay Area". Last time I saw something in the paper, Alameda and > >> Contra Costra counties -failed- because the winds brought all the crap in > >> the air over SF and the pennisula inland. > >> > > > >Just reciting what was written in the Chronicle. > > > >Most of the autos belching smog in SF come from Contra Costa and Alameda > >Co.'s anyway...so it serves them right. It's bad enough they clog up our > >streets, soak up our parking, and constantly run through our lights in > >their tank SUV's...thank God their pollutants blow right back at them. > > I guess you have your hands full with all the urine and feces from your > neighbors. You mean all the transplant bums who come to SF looking for free hand-outs and easy money? Sorry, they ain't my neighbors. Their gravy train is finally and thankfully about to come to an end...then they can go back to wherever the hell they come from and leech off the public there. > Man, just when you think people can't get even more pathetic, > someone like you shows up. Wow, I'll bet your the king of insults in the Teenbeatz AOL chat room with zingers like that. --Mike
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<nospam-DDA6C7.01561604072002@news.easynews.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-xfer.siscom.net!easynews!news.easynews.com.POSTED!nospamReferences:
<1SDKJDLKJSDLKSDf22@cacacaca.edu> <nospam-28AEBF.20201203072002@news.easynews.com> <3lg7iuk09v3vmr3vlsaktob8igo7cvbqef@news.supernews.com> <nospam-11FE6F.21542403072002@news.easynews.com> <ump7iu4s0mse07shsitmag5bjobfgm9b3e@4ax.com> <nospam-A19A8A.00122404072002@news.easynews.com> <ihv7iuocuk1nplq5k8ee5g1vncfhenrcu2@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 110a63,7668f55b611c2f66 X-Google-Attributes: gid110a63,public X-Google-Thread: fb9af,7668f55b611c2f66 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb9af,public X-Google-Thread: 10b9bd,7668f55b611c2f66 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b9bd,public X-Google-Thread: f824f,7668f55b611c2f66 X-Google-Attributes: gidf824f,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-07-04 01:57:12 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-xfer.siscom.net!easynews!news.easynews.com.POSTED!nospam From: Michael Wise <nospam@no.spam> Newsgroups: talk.rumors,talk.politics.libertarian,alt.politics.greens,ba.general Subject: Re: San Francisco EXEMPT from California smog checks!! References: <1SDKJDLKJSDLKSDf22@cacacaca.edu> <nospam-28AEBF.20201203072002@news.easynews.com> <3lg7iuk09v3vmr3vlsaktob8igo7cvbqef@news.supernews.com> <nospam-11FE6F.21542403072002@news.easynews.com> <ump7iu4s0mse07shsitmag5bjobfgm9b3e@4ax.com> <nospam-A19A8A.00122404072002@news.easynews.com> <ihv7iuocuk1nplq5k8ee5g1vncfhenrcu2@4ax.com> User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.2 (PPC Mac OS X) Message-ID: <nospam-DDA6C7.01561604072002@news.easynews.com> Lines: 48 X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com Organization: EasyNews, UseNet made Easy! - Test our service with our FREE trial at https://www.easynews.com/trial/trial.phtml X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly. Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2002 08:53:34 GMT