Re: San Francisco EXEMPT from California smog checks!!

Article View: talk.rumors

Article #570

#570

From: GeneK
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2002 17:34

13 lines
2394 bytes

"John Higdon" <no-spam@ClearChannel.RadioMonopoly.com> wrote...
> But the smog II tests are done differently (like on a dynamometer). You
> don't know what your car's numbers will be until you do the tests.

Actually, I do, at least I know what the car did a couple of years ago when
the engine was rebuilt; the shop did dyno testing on the completed install,
and the numbers were well within the limits of even Smog II.  I'm not sure
exactly why they did those numbers, it may have been part of their testing
of the rebuild.  They fellow who rebuilt my engine said pretty much what
I did, that any car that's been properly maintained shouldn't have any probs
with the test.  I haven't heard any reports of peoples' cars failing Smog II
en masse in the areas where it's been instituted so far, have you?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <dH%U8.27586$Dn3.86953@dfw-read.news.verio.net>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!129.250.35.146!iad-peer.news.verio.net!news.verio.net!dfw-read.news.verio.net.POSTED!not-for-mail

References:

<3lg7iuk09v3vmr3vlsaktob8igo7cvbqef@news.supernews.com> <Jkj39023j49kkgfndDKDKD@reassu.edu> <b3n7iug4376jjq15qe2iaqv5k0imcnenup@news.supernews.com> <lgRU8.27548$Dn3.86275@dfw-read.news.verio.net> <B949CAB8.66207%no-spam@ClearChannel.RadioMonopoly.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 110a63,7668f55b611c2f66
X-Google-Attributes: gid110a63,public
X-Google-Thread: f824f,7668f55b611c2f66
X-Google-Attributes: gidf824f,public
X-Google-Thread: 10a942,11fa6142ea145529
X-Google-Attributes: gid10a942,public
X-Google-Thread: fb9af,7668f55b611c2f66
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb9af,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-07-04 10:33:57 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!129.250.35.146!iad-peer.news.verio.net!news.verio.net!dfw-read.news.verio.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "GeneK" <gene@genek_hates_spammers.com>
Newsgroups: talk.rumors,alt.politics.greens,ba.general,alt.california
References: <3lg7iuk09v3vmr3vlsaktob8igo7cvbqef@news.supernews.com> <Jkj39023j49kkgfndDKDKD@reassu.edu> <b3n7iug4376jjq15qe2iaqv5k0imcnenup@news.supernews.com> <lgRU8.27548$Dn3.86275@dfw-read.news.verio.net> <B949CAB8.66207%no-spam@ClearChannel.RadioMonopoly.com>
Subject: Re: San Francisco EXEMPT from California smog checks!!
Lines: 15
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Message-ID: <dH%U8.27586$Dn3.86953@dfw-read.news.verio.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 10:34:41 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.234.252.91
X-Complaints-To: abuse@verio.net
X-Trace: dfw-read.news.verio.net 1025804105 12.234.252.91 (Thu, 04 Jul 2002 17:35:05 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2002 17:35:05 GMT
Organization: NTT/Verio

Reply to Parent Message