🚀 go-pugleaf

Birdie Bits wrote:

> "The proposed power plant would generate more than electricity
> for the  local economy: $6 million in annual tax revenues, $1
> million for neighborhood improvement and $156,000 each year in
> scholarship funds.  Despite all these benefits, residents of
> South Gate appear prepared to fight the construction of this
> power plant. "

OK.. I read that... what part of the people that live there don't want
it is it you don't understand? ($156,000 ain't squat). Tax revenue
means a lot to a blue collar worker (not). How about a cut of the
income generated for each household?

>    =================================================
> California doesn't have power because the nuts there oppose
> power plants, even wind machines, but the CA nuts want to
> blame Texas instead.
>    =================================================

There you go again.. if the power brokers were selling it to us at
the same price they are to other places, there wouldn't be a row,
but I see they are starting to turn the screws on a lot of other
places now too and many states are re-thinking this so-called
de-regulation.  And again you say we oppose wind machines,
that is a lie. Lies about new power plants, Hemet brought 2 new
turbines on-line recently and will double that (they may have
already) again you lie. You take things out of context, stretch
it and then run with the lies.

PBS had a documentary this morning about the "energy crisis" Enron's
Ken Lay laughed right into the camera, he couldn't even keep a straight
face about the gouging. But he will be willing to "take a haircut" to
end the problem.  And El Paso gas doesn't know who has the *millions*
of dollars they gouged at the Ca border! LOLOL

Which energy company are you shilling for? Or are you a repub staffer
hack?  What's in it for you? At any rate, we will see you all in court,
and again on the senate floor.

'rena